PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Comparing two ligation methods for dog neutering surgery outcomes

By Şenocak, Mümin Gökhan·Published in Veterinary medicine and science·2023·Department of Surgery·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Comparison of spermatic cord ligation and the vas plexus ligation in canine orchiectomy: A prospective clinical study.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of 30 male dogs underwent surgery to remove their testicles, using two different methods: spermatic cord ligation (SCL) and vas deferens to pampiniform plexus ligation (VPL). The VPL method resulted in less inflammation at the surgical site, but it took a bit longer to perform and had more bleeding compared to SCL. Both methods were found to be safe and effective, with no significant differences in pain or surgeon satisfaction. Ultimately, VPL may be a better option for reducing inflammation after surgery.

People also search for: dog orchiectomy recovery · dog testicle removal methods · canine surgery inflammation treatment

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Orchiectomy with a vas deferens to pampiniform plexus ligation (VPL) is a novel method, and it is unclear how its short-term outcomes compare with the results of a conventional method, spermatic cord ligation (SCL). OBJECTIVE: To compare the short-term outcomes of SCL and VPL on inflammation, surgery time, bleeding, pain and surgeon satisfaction during canine open orchiectomy. METHODS: Thirty male crossbred dogs undergoing open orchiectomy were enrolled the study. Dogs were randomly allocated to one of the SCL or VPL groups, with 15 patients in each. In the SCL group, the spermatic cord was ligated using absorbable sutures. The vas deferens, and pampiniform plexus self-tying were performed in the VPL group. Surgery time, bleeding and surgeon satisfaction scores were recorded. Inflammation at the surgical site was assessed using infrared thermal camera over three days, and pain associated with inflammation was scored on the third day. RESULTS: On Day 3, the average temperature in the SCL group was significantly higher than that of the VPL group, with a mean difference of 4.63&#xb0;C (95% CI: 2.34-6.93, p&#xa0;<&#xa0;0.001). Moreover, the surgery time in the VPL group was significantly longer compared to the SCL group, with a mean difference of 1.7&#xa0;min (95% CI: 0.28-3.11, p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.021). The bleeding score was also significantly higher in the VPL group (p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.012). On the other hand, surgeon satisfaction and pain scores were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSION: Both SCL and VPL methods are safe and effective for orchiectomy in dogs. VPL is comparable in efficacy and safety and has the additional benefit of less inflammation.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37466009/