PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Prednisone vs cyclosporine for treating immune joint disease in dogs

By Rhoades, Amy C et al.·Published in Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association·2016·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Comparison of the efficacy of prednisone and cyclosporine for treatment of dogs with primary immune-mediated polyarthritis.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of 20 dogs with immune-mediated polyarthritis (a condition causing painful joint inflammation) were treated with either prednisone or cyclosporine for 90 days to see which worked better. Both treatments helped about the same number of dogs, but those on prednisone were more likely to experience side effects like increased thirst and hunger. Some dogs on cyclosporine developed infections or diarrhea, leading to treatment changes. Overall, cyclosporine showed potential as a good alternative to prednisone for managing this condition in dogs.

People also search for: dog joint pain treatment · prednisone side effects in dogs · cyclosporine for dog arthritis

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare efficacy between cyclosporine and prednisone for treatment of primary immune-mediated polyarthritis (IMPA) in dogs. DESIGN: Randomized controlled clinical trial. ANIMALS: 20 client-owned dogs with primary IMPA. PROCEDURES: Dogs were randomly assigned to receive prednisone (starting at 1 mg/kg [0.45 mg/lb], PO, q 12 h; n = 10) or cyclosporine (5 mg/kg [2.3 mg/lb], PO, q 12 h; 10) for 90 days. Cyclosporine-treated dogs also received carprofen, tramadol, or both for the first 7 days for analgesia. Data collection, physical examination, and cytologic analysis of synovial fluid samples were performed on days 0, 14, 45, and 90. Trough whole blood cyclosporine concentrations were determined on days 7 to 17 for cyclosporine-treated dogs. Treatment failure was defined as lack of clinical improvement by day 14, lack of cytologic improvement by day 45, or need to change treatment because of adverse effects. RESULTS: Treatment was successful for 7 prednisone-treated dogs and 7 cyclosporine-treated dogs. Absence of synovial fluid cytologic abnormalities on day 45 was identified for 5 prednisone-treated dogs and 8 cyclosporine-treated dogs. Prednisone-treated dogs were more likely to develop polyuria, polydipsia, and polyphagia than were cyclosporine-treated dogs. Opportunistic infections (ie, demodicosis or Erysipelothrix bacteremia) were identified in 2 cyclosporine-treated dogs and 0 prednisone-treated dogs, and diarrhea developed in 1 cyclosporine-treated dog, requiring treatment discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Although the number of dogs evaluated was small, limiting generalizability, results of this study suggested that cyclosporine offers promise as a suitable alternative to prednisone for treatment of IMPA in dogs.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26829271/