Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
How dog and cat skin heals with or without fat under the skin
By Bohling, Mark W et al.·Published in Veterinary surgery : VS·2006·Auburn University College of Veterinary Medicine, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Comparison of the role of the subcutaneous tissues in cutaneous wound healing in the dog and cat.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A study looked at how the removal of subcutaneous tissue affects wound healing in dogs and cats. Researchers created wounds on both sides of the back of six beagle dogs and six domestic shorthaired cats, removing the subcutaneous tissue on one side. They found that while the removal didn't significantly affect the strength of sutured wounds after a week, it did slow down healing in both species when healing by second intention (without sutures). Cats experienced more delays in healing compared to dogs, and some dogs had minor infections. This suggests that removing too much subcutaneous tissue can hinder healing, especially in cats.
People also search for: cat wound healing · dog wound infection treatment · how to care for cat wounds · dog skin healing after surgery · cat wound care tips
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare the contribution of the subcutaneous tissues to 1st and 2nd intention cutaneous wound healing in the dog and cat. STUDY DESIGN: Experimental study. ANIMALS: Domestic shorthaired cats (n=6) and 6 beagle dogs. METHODS: Paired wounds were created on either side of the dorsal midline; the subcutaneous tissue was removed on 1 side and left intact on the other. Square, open wounds of the dorsal aspect of the thorax were observed for 21 days to monitor granulation tissue formation, wound contraction, epithelialization, and total healing (contraction+epithelialization). Breaking strength of sutured linear wounds was measured 7 days after wounding. Laser-Doppler perfusion imaging (LDPI) was used to measure cutaneous perfusion. RESULTS: First intention healing: subcutaneous tissue removal had no consistent effect on sutured wound strength at 7 days in dogs or cats. Second intention healing: removal of subcutaneous tissue reduced wound perfusion, granulation, contraction, epithelialization, and total healing. Granulation tissue formation and wound contraction were delayed to a significantly greater degree in cats than in dogs (P<.05). Two dogs (33%) had minor wound infections. CONCLUSIONS: The subcutaneous tissues make an important contribution to 2nd intention cutaneous healing. Dog and cat wounds had delayed 2nd intention healing when subcutaneous tissues were removed; wounds in dogs, but not cats, had largely recovered from this delay by 21 days. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Extensive debridement of subcutaneous tissue may delay wound healing particularly in feline patients. A higher risk for wound infections may accompany extensive removal of subcutaneous tissues in dogs.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16409403/