PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Differences in trotting gait in dogs with knee or hip arthritis

By Madore, E et al.·Published in Veterinary and comparative orthopaedics and traumatology : V.C.O.T·2007·Department of Clinical Sciences, Canada·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Comparison of trot kinetics between dogs with stifle or hip arthrosis.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of large breed dogs with hip or knee arthritis were studied to see how their trotting gait compared to normal dogs. The researchers found that both groups of dogs with arthritis had less force when they trotted, indicating they were not using their legs as effectively as healthy dogs. Dogs with knee arthritis showed more severe changes in their gait than those with hip arthritis. This information can help veterinarians better understand how to assess and treat lameness in dogs with these conditions.

People also search for: dog limping treatment · hip arthritis in dogs · knee arthritis in dogs · how to help dog with arthritis · dog gait analysis

Abstract

The purposes of this study were: 1) to describe and compare the trotting gait of normal and lame dogs secondary to stifle (GONOA) or hip (COXOA) osteoarthritis (OA) using multiple ground reaction forces (GRF) parameters, and 2) to pinpoint any characteristic in gait profile ('signatures') which could help to discriminate a lameness secondary to GONOA or COXOA. Fifty-one large breed dogs with OA (19 GONOA, 32 COXOA) and 22 normal dogs were included in the study. The vertical and cranio-caudal (braking-propelling) GRF were collected. The total stance time, and for each orthogonal vector, the peak force, impulse, time to peak, and the rate of limb loading were recorded. Vertical and craniocaudal forces were found to be significantly decreased in both OA groups compared to normal dogs. Vertical, cranial and caudal limb loading were also most often lower for both OA groups. In addition, the vertical and cranial forces were significantly lower in dogs with GONOA compared to COXOA and normal dogs. This study has demonstrated that, at a trotting gait, OA dogs secondary to GONOA and COXOA load their affected limb, brake and propel earlier during the stance phase, but generally with less magnitude than normal dogs. Dogs affected by GONOA also present more severe gait alterations than dogs with COXOA. The vertical and braking specific GRF alterations described may be kinetic 'signatures' linked more to lame dogs secondary to GONOA versus COXOA. Finally, this study has also provided useful baseline GRF data for further clinical and research investigations.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17546210/