Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Best way to collect ear samples in dogs with ear infections
By Choi, Nellie et al.·Published in Veterinary dermatology·2018·Animal Dermatology Clinic, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Comparison of two ear cytological collection techniques in dogs with otitis externa.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 30 dogs with ear infections (otitis externa) had their ear samples collected using two different methods: a cotton swab and a rubber tube. The study found that the rubber tube method was better at collecting certain immune cells, which can help in diagnosing and monitoring treatment for ear infections. Both methods were well tolerated by the dogs, meaning they didn't seem to mind the process. This new technique could provide more accurate information for vets when treating ear infections in dogs.
People also search for: dog ear infection treatment · otitis externa in dogs · ear cytology for dogs
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Canine otitis externa is a common disease. Cytological evaluation of otic exudate is a useful diagnostic test to direct and monitor treatment for otitis externa. One method of collecting ear cytological specimens utilizes a cotton-tipped swab inserted into the vertical ear canal. A proposed alternative method is to aspirate exudate from the deep horizontal canal using a rubber tube. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: To compare cytological findings between two different collection techniques by evaluating the numbers of bacteria, Malassezia yeast and inflammatory cells. ANIMALS: Thirty client-owned dogs with otitis externa. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A prospective, randomized, blinded comparison study. Ear canals from each dog were sampled using cotton swab and rubber tube. Ear cytological preparations were evaluated independently by two investigators for polymorphonuclear leucocytes (PMN), monocytes/lymphocytes, macrophages, yeast, intracellular (IC) cocci, extracellular (EC) cocci, IC bacilli and EC bacilli. RESULTS: A paired Student's t-test was used to compare the two techniques. The inter-investigator reliability for PMN, EC bacilli and yeast was good, and for EC cocci was moderate. There were significantly higher numbers of PMNs obtained by the tube method (P = 0.0024) than by the cotton swab method. There were no statistically significant differences between cotton swab and rubber tube methods for monocytes/lymphocytes (P = 0.7780), macrophages (P = 0.1751), EC cocci (P = 0.1262), EC bacilli (P = 0.1162), yeast (P = 0.5371), IC cocci (P = 0.6606) or IC bacilli (P = 0.6761). The technique was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: An alternative ear cytological collection technique was identified which enables sampling of the deep horizontal canal.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30109742/