Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Complications and risks of cecal or colonic surgery in dogs
By James, J C et al.·Published in The Journal of small animal practice·2024·Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Complications and putative risk factors for cecal or colonic surgery in dogs: 79 cases (2002-2015).
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 79 dogs that underwent surgery on their cecum or colon were studied to understand the risks and complications associated with these procedures. The surgeries included both full thickness and partial thickness incisions, and the rates of complications and death were similar for both types. However, surgeries performed outside regular hours showed a potential increase in complications. Overall, the presence of a board-certified surgeon did not significantly impact the outcomes. Most dogs recovered well after surgery, but owners should be aware of the timing of the procedure as a possible risk factor.
People also search for: dog colon surgery complications · cecal surgery risks in dogs · dog surgery recovery tips
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the complication rate, mortality rate and putative risk factors for cecal or colonic surgery in dogs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multi-institutional retrospective study including dogs that had undergone surgery that involved the cecum or the colon. Medical records from three referral hospitals were reviewed for patient demographics and clinical data. The association between putative risk factors and survival to discharge or complications was assessed using univariable and multivariable analysis. RESULTS: Seventy-nine dogs met the criteria to be included in this study. Fifty-five dogs had full thickness incision surgeries, while 24 dogs had partial thickness surgeries. The complication and mortality rates for full thickness and partial thickness cecal/colonic surgeries were not statistically different. The dehiscence rate of colonic anastomosis in this study was four of 47 (8.5%). On univariate analysis, performing full thickness procedures out of hours had an association with increased complications and mortality. On multivariable analysis, no factors were associated with survival to discharge or complications. There was no association of board-certified surgeon presence in surgery with complications or mortality. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The performance of full thickness cecal/colonic surgery is not associated with a statistically significant increased risk for complications or mortality compared to partial thickness procedures, with a possible increased risk of complications and mortality in full thickness procedures out of hours.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39001633/