Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Complications from flash glucose monitors in diabetic dogs
By Campbell, Carson et al.·Published in Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire·2023·Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine at Tufts University, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Complications associated with a flash glucose monitoring system in diabetic dogs.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of diabetic dogs had a flash glucose monitoring system (FGMS) placed to help track their blood sugar levels. While most sensors stayed attached for the full 14 days, about 38% of the dogs experienced some complications, mainly mild skin issues like redness and crusting at the sensor site. These skin changes could be due to irritation or sensitivity to the sensor. Overall, the FGMS was found to be safe for use in dogs, but it's important for pet owners to be aware of these potential skin reactions.
People also search for: diabetic dog glucose monitor complications · dog skin problems from glucose sensor · flash glucose monitoring system for dogs
Abstract
Interstitial glucose monitoring systems are commonly being used in diabetic dogs. The aim of this study was to document the incidence of complications associated with the use of a flash glucose monitoring system (FGMS) in dogs. Medical records of dogs that had placement of a 14-day FGMS during a 1-year period were reviewed. Data retrieved included the number of days the sensor remained attached and functional, sensor detachment, sensor failure prior to the end of the 14-day monitoring period, and dermatologic changes at the sensor site. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the data. Thirty-four dogs had FGMSs placed. Most [32/34 (94%)] sensors were placed over the dorsolateral aspect of the thorax caudal to the scapula. Twenty-four sensors (71%) remained attached for the full 14 days. Incidence of complications associated with FGMS use was 13/34 (38%). The most frequent complication was mild dermatologic changes at the sensor site [6/34 (18%)]. Erythema and crusting at the attachment site were common and could be related to contact dermatitis, hypersensitivity, or skin preparation prior to placement. Flash glucose monitoring systems are safe in dogs, although there are some potential complications that should be discussed with dog owners.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37790268/