PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Complications from vascular access ports in dogs and cats

By Culp, William T N et al.·Published in Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association·2010·Department of Clinical Studies, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Complications associated with use of subcutaneous vascular access ports in cats and dogs undergoing fractionated radiotherapy: 172 cases (1996-2007).

Plain-English summary

A group of 172 cats and dogs undergoing radiation therapy had subcutaneous vascular access ports (SVAPs) placed to help with treatment. However, some pets experienced complications, with female pets being five times more likely to face major issues compared to males. Additionally, pets that did not receive a specific anesthetic called propofol were much more likely to have serious complications. The study suggests that while SVAPs can be helpful, certain factors like the pet's sex and the type of vein used for placement can increase the risk of problems.

People also search for: cat radiation therapy complications · dog SVAP issues · propofol anesthesia effects in pets · female dog surgery risks · vascular access port problems in cats

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe complications associated with use of a subcutaneous vascular access port (SVAP) in cats and dogs treated with fractionated radiotherapy and to determine predisposing factors for developing these complications. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. ANIMALS: 46 cats and 126 dogs. PROCEDURES: The medical records of cats and dogs undergoing radiation therapy that received placement of an SVAP between March 1996 and August 2007 were reviewed. Data were recorded and analyzed to determine factors for development of complications associated with the use of an SVAP during treatment with fractionated radiotherapy. RESULTS: 18 and 36 major and minor complications were identified, respectively. Sex and the lack of administration of propofol during anesthesia induction were significantly associated with development of major complications. Female cats and dogs were 5.00 times as likely as male cats and dogs to develop major complications associated with SVAP usage. Animals in which propofol was not administered were 19.15 times as likely as animals administered propofol to develop major complications. Placement of SVAP catheters in a femoral vein was 17.20 times as likely as placement in the jugular vein to result in minor complications. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Factors associated with the development of complications included sex, propofol administration, and vein in which an SVAP catheter was inserted. The use of an SVAP may be a useful alternative to repeated catheterizations in cats and dogs.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20550447/