Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
X-ray grading and outcomes of tibial avulsion fractures in dogs
By Alas, Oscar et al.·Published in Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association·2025·Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Comprehensive radiographic grading system and clinical outcomes of canine tibial avulsion fractures in dogs.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A 6-month-old Labrador puppy was brought in for limping on the back leg due to a tibial avulsion fracture, which is a type of injury common in young dogs. The vet used a new grading system to classify the fracture and determined the best surgical approach for treatment. After surgery, the puppy showed good recovery and was able to walk normally again. This study helps improve how vets can diagnose and treat these specific fractures in young dogs.
People also search for: puppy limping back leg · tibial avulsion fracture treatment · dog leg injury recovery
Abstract
The tibial apophysis is a separate center of ossification in the proximal tibia of skeletally immature dogs. Because it is made of cartilage during development, it is prone to fractures (avulsions) and other tensile-related injuries. One prior veterinary study proposed a classification system for proximal tibial apophyseal fractures, but this study did not include fractures that involved the proximal tibial physis or metaphysis, which have been described in human classification systems. The objectives of the study reported here were (1) to characterize and establish a radiographic grading system of proximal tibial apophyseal fractures in dogs, (2) to investigate the intra- and interobserver agreements of the proposed grading system, and (3) to identify associations between fracture types and patient signalment, surgical fixation, and clinical outcomes. This is a retrospective and observational study where images were assessed twice in a randomized order at least two weeks apart by three observers. The most frequent fracture configurations were type 1 (33/49, 67.3%) and type 5 (13/49, 26.5%), followed by type 4 (2/49, 4%) and type 2 (1/49, 2%). A fracture configuration type 3 was not identified. Dogs with a concurrent fibular fracture were associated with type 4 and 5 tibial avulsion fractures (P < .01). The intraobserver agreement for observers 1 and 2 was kappa ≥0.88, and for observer 3, kappa = 0.63. In conclusion, this study introduces an enhanced classification system for tibial apophyseal fractures in dogs, demonstrating substantial to moderate intraobserver reliability and moderate to modest interobserver agreement.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39681979/