PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

CT scans find elbow arthritis in cats better than X-rays

By Ley, Charles J et al.·Published in Research in veterinary science·2021·Department of Clinical Sciences·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Computed tomography is superior to radiography for detection of feline elbow osteoarthritis.

Species:
cat

Plain-English summary

A study found that computed tomography (CT) is better than regular X-rays for spotting elbow arthritis in cats. In this research, 29 cats had their elbows examined using both methods, and the results were compared to tissue samples that showed the actual condition of the cartilage. While both CT and X-rays were good at detecting moderate to severe arthritis, X-rays missed early signs of the disease. The researchers suggest that CT should be used for diagnosing elbow arthritis in cats, especially when looking for early changes.

People also search for: cat elbow arthritis symptoms · feline osteoarthritis treatment · how to diagnose cat arthritis

Abstract

Elbow osteoarthritis (OA) is common in cats and radiography is typically used for diagnosis. However computed tomography (CT), with its multiplanar three-dimensional characteristics, could have significant advantages for assessment of OA compared to radiography, particularly early in the disease process. The study objectives were to compare radiography and CT to histologic OA changes, investigate the stage of OA that radiography and CT detect, and search for specific changes in CT images strongly predictive for feline elbow OA. Right elbows from 29 cats were evaluated by radiography and CT, and articular cartilage lesions graded histologically and macroscopically. Three further joints were sampled to specifically evaluate the morphology of the anconeal process. Macroscopic, radiographic and CT OA diagnosis were compared to the reference standard histologic OA that was divided into mild, moderate and severe. Osteophytic spurs on the lateral margin of the anconeal process could be reliably measured in CT images (intra-class correlation 0.79) and when ≥0.5 mm had high sensitivity for moderate/severe histologic OA, moderate sensitivity for mild histologic OA and high specificity for all stages of OA. In moderate/severe histologic OA both radiography and CT subjective OA diagnosis had moderate to very high sensitivity. However, in mild histologic OA CT grading had low sensitivity and radiography did not detect OA. In conclusion, CT of the feline elbow including measurement of osteophytes on the anconeal process lateral margin is superior to radiography for OA detection and should be considered for OA diagnosis, particularly when mild OA changes are of interest.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34365276/