PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

CT scans compared to arthroscopy for dog elbow dysplasia detection

By Moores, Andrew P et al.·Published in Veterinary surgery : VS·2008·Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, United Kingdom·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Computed tomography versus arthroscopy for detection of canine elbow dysplasia lesions.

Species:
dog
Movement & jointsDogs

Plain-English summary

A group of dogs with elbow dysplasia underwent both CT scans and arthroscopy to check for joint problems. The study found that certain CT signs, like a fragment on the medial coronoid process, were linked to findings during surgery, such as cartilage damage. However, not all CT signs matched what was seen during arthroscopy, meaning that one test could show issues while the other might not. This suggests that while CT can be helpful in diagnosing elbow problems, it doesn't always provide a complete picture.

People also search for: dog elbow dysplasia symptoms · CT scan vs arthroscopy for dogs · dog joint pain treatment

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe associations between computed tomography (CT) and arthroscopy in dogs with elbow dysplasia lesions. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective clinical study. SAMPLE POPULATION: Canine elbows (n=101) investigated by CT and arthroscopy. METHODS: CT scans were reviewed for 10 predetermined CT signs and graded for osteophyte size. Surgical reports were reviewed for specific disease features and cartilage erosion grades. Associations between variables were investigated with multivariate logistic regression and correlation between osteophyte size and cartilage erosion with Spearman's rank order correlation. RESULTS: Medial coronoid process (MCP) fragment on CT was significantly associated with the arthroscopic identification of a displaced MCP fragment, cartilage erosion affecting the MCP, and cartilage erosion affecting the humeral condyle. Irregular radial incisure of the ulna on CT was significantly associated with the arthroscopic identification of cartilage erosion affecting the MCP. Osteophytes on CT were significantly associated with an abnormal arthroscopic examination. There was a moderately significant correlation between CT osteophyte grade and cartilage erosion grades for areas of the medial joint compartment (r(s)=0.44-0.48). CONCLUSION: Some CT signs are significantly associated with arthroscopic features of elbow dysplasia lesions in dogs; however, other CT signs were not associated with arthroscopic findings, and CT and arthroscopy can provide contradictory information. Osteophyte size is moderately correlated with cartilage erosion of the medial joint compartment. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: CT can provide valuable information for the investigation of dogs with elbow dysplasia, but the absence of CT signs (or the absence of arthroscopic abnormalities) does not rule out elbow lesions.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18564264/