Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Computer vision applications in vascular surgery: a systematic review and critical appraisal.
- Year:
- 2026
- Authors:
- Liyanage A et al.
- Affiliation:
- Faculty of Medicine · Canada
Abstract
Computer vision is a rapidly growing field with tools emerging to support clinical practice. This systematic review and critical appraisal synthesizes the applications of computer vision in vascular surgery. MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched from inception to June 28, 2024. Vascular diseases studied, data sources, methods and outcomes were recorded. Critical appraisal was conducted using the PROBAST and TRIPOD+AI guidelines. Overall, 288 studies were included with an exponential rise from 2017 onwards. The majority of studies addressed aortic pathologies (33%), carotid stenosis (30%), and foot ulcers (25%), while few focused on peripheral artery disease (6%). Most were observational using retrospective (81%) or prospective data (15%), and one clinical trial was included. Dice coefficient (51%) and accuracy (36%) were the most commonly reported performance metrics with infrequent use of AUROC (17%). Only 15% of studies had a low risk of bias and overall adherence to the TRIPOD+AI checklist was relatively poor at 57%. Overall, we suggest greater attention to peripheral artery disease; for dice coefficient and AUROC to be used in segmentation and discrimination tasks, respectively; and for the TRIPOD+AI statement to be consulted early on during model development.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication: https://europepmc.org/article/MED/41708923