PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Deafness rates and traits in Dogo Argentino dogs

By Strain, George M·Published in The Veterinary record·2021·School of Veterinary Medicine, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Congenital sensorineural deafness in Dogo Argentino dogs: Prevalence and phenotype associations.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A study found that about 25% of Dogo Argentino dogs have congenital sensorineural deafness, which means they may be deaf in one or both ears. The research showed that dogs without a white patch on their coat were more likely to be deaf, and blue-eyed dogs also had a higher chance of being affected compared to brown-eyed dogs. However, the link between eye color and deafness wasn't strong enough to draw firm conclusions. If you have a Dogo Argentino, it's a good idea to have their hearing checked, especially if they have these traits.

People also search for: Dogo Argentino deafness symptoms · how to test dog hearing · congenital deafness in dogs

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Dogo Argentino dog breed is affected by hereditary congenital sensorineural deafness (CSD) associated with white pigmentation, but prevalence data and associations with phenotypes have not been reported. METHODS: In a retrospective study, animals were tested by the brainstem auditory evoked response, and phenotype data of sex, iris color, patch presence/absence and parent hearing status were collected. Chi-square analyses were performed to identify associations between deafness and phenotype traits. RESULTS: BAER results and phenotype data were collected for 811 dogs. Hearing status was 74.23% bilaterally hearing, 20.35% unilaterally deaf and 5.43% bilaterally deaf or an overall prevalence of 25.77%. CSD was not associated with sex, but dogs without a patch had a significantly higher prevalence rate than patched dogs. Blue-eyed dogs had higher prevalence rates than brown-eyed dogs, but because of small sample size the χassociation was not considered valid. Insufficient numbers of dogs with a unilaterally deaf parent were present to assess the effects of parent hearing status. CONCLUSION: Approximately one fourth of a US Dogo Argentino population was deaf in one or both ears, but dogs with a patch had a lower prevalence. Dogs with a blue eye were more likely to be deaf, but the association significance could not be reliably assessed.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33870537/