Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Deafness rates and traits in Dogo Argentino dogs
By Strain, George M·Published in The Veterinary record·2021·School of Veterinary Medicine, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Congenital sensorineural deafness in Dogo Argentino dogs: Prevalence and phenotype associations.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A study found that about 25% of Dogo Argentino dogs have congenital sensorineural deafness, which means they may be deaf in one or both ears. The research showed that dogs without a white patch on their coat were more likely to be deaf, and blue-eyed dogs also had a higher chance of being affected compared to brown-eyed dogs. However, the link between eye color and deafness wasn't strong enough to draw firm conclusions. If you have a Dogo Argentino, it's a good idea to have their hearing checked, especially if they have these traits.
People also search for: Dogo Argentino deafness symptoms · how to test dog hearing · congenital deafness in dogs
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Dogo Argentino dog breed is affected by hereditary congenital sensorineural deafness (CSD) associated with white pigmentation, but prevalence data and associations with phenotypes have not been reported. METHODS: In a retrospective study, animals were tested by the brainstem auditory evoked response, and phenotype data of sex, iris color, patch presence/absence and parent hearing status were collected. Chi-square analyses were performed to identify associations between deafness and phenotype traits. RESULTS: BAER results and phenotype data were collected for 811 dogs. Hearing status was 74.23% bilaterally hearing, 20.35% unilaterally deaf and 5.43% bilaterally deaf or an overall prevalence of 25.77%. CSD was not associated with sex, but dogs without a patch had a significantly higher prevalence rate than patched dogs. Blue-eyed dogs had higher prevalence rates than brown-eyed dogs, but because of small sample size the χassociation was not considered valid. Insufficient numbers of dogs with a unilaterally deaf parent were present to assess the effects of parent hearing status. CONCLUSION: Approximately one fourth of a US Dogo Argentino population was deaf in one or both ears, but dogs with a patch had a lower prevalence. Dogs with a blue eye were more likely to be deaf, but the association significance could not be reliably assessed.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33870537/