Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Long-term gait results after surgery or conservative care for dogs
By Burton, Neil J et al.·Published in Veterinary surgery : VS·2011·University of Bristol, United Kingdom·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Conservative versus arthroscopic management for medial coronoid process disease in dogs: a prospective gait evaluation.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of dogs with medial coronoid process disease (a condition affecting the elbow joint) were treated either with surgery to remove damaged tissue or with conservative management, which included medication. After a year, both treatment groups showed some improvement, but neither returned to normal function. Interestingly, the dogs that had surgery experienced more lameness in the early weeks compared to those managed conservatively. Ultimately, neither treatment led to a complete recovery, and both groups still showed signs of limping.
People also search for: dog elbow pain treatment · medial coronoid process disease in dogs · surgery for dog lameness · conservative management for dog joint issues
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate, using objective gait analysis, the long-term outcome of dogs with medial coronoid process disease (MCPD) treated with conservative management (CM) versus arthroscopic treatment (AT). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective clinical trial. ANIMALS: Dogs (n = 20) with unilaterally confirmed MCPD. METHODS: Eleven dogs were treated arthroscopically with removal of coronoid fragments and burring of any associated chondromalacic cartridge and 9 dogs were managed conservatively. All dogs were administered a 6-week course of oral tepoxalin on enrollment. Inverse dynamics gait analysis was performed at initial presentation and at 4, 8, 26, and 52 weeks. The gait variables analyzed were elbow moment (EM), elbow power (EP), total support moment (TSM), and total support moment ratio (TSMR) as a measure of forelimb asymmetry. RESULTS: Affected peak EM increased from 0.58 to 0.76 Nm/kg in the AT dogs, and from 0.66 to 0.81 Nm/kg in the CM dogs and there was no significant difference between groups. Affected peak EP increased marginally in the AT dogs, but was unchanged in the CM dogs and there was no significant difference between groups. TSM increased from 1.49 to 1.92 Nm/kg in the AT dogs and from 1.52 to 2.06 Nm/kg in the CM dogs and there was no significant difference between groups. TSMR was statistically different between treatment groups at 1 (P = .003) and 2 months (P = .048) with the AT group more asymmetric and hence more lame. TSMR at 12 months was 0.83 (AT) and 0.86 (CM) implying a failure of return to soundness by either group. CONCLUSIONS: AT dogs had increased mechanical asymmetry at 4 and 8 weeks compared to the CM group revealing surgery worsened limb function. There was no significant difference in mechanical symmetry between groups at 26 and 52 weeks.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22091562/