Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Constructing naive Bayesian classifiers for veterinary medicine: a case study in the clinical diagnosis of classical swine fever.
- Journal:
- Research in veterinary science
- Year:
- 2011
- Authors:
- Geenen, P L et al.
- Affiliation:
- Department of Information and Computing Sciences · Netherlands
Plain-English summary
This study looks at a method called naive Bayesian classifiers, which can help veterinarians diagnose diseases when it's not clear what's wrong. The researchers used this method to tell the difference between pig herds that were infected with classical swine fever (a serious viral disease) and those that were not, using data from an outbreak in the Netherlands in the late 1990s. They found that these classifiers were about 67-70% accurate, which is similar to or even better than a previously established diagnostic method. One advantage of the classifiers is that they consider both the presence and absence of certain symptoms, making them more effective. Overall, the study suggests that naive Bayesian classifiers could be useful tools for veterinarians facing diagnostic challenges.
Abstract
For diseases of which the clinical diagnosis is uncertain, naive Bayesian classifiers can be of assistance to the veterinary practitioner. These simple probabilistic models have proven to be very powerful for solving classification problems in a variety of domains, but are not yet widely applied within the veterinary domain. In this paper, naive Bayesian classifiers and methods for their construction are reviewed. We demonstrate how to construct full and selective classifiers from a data set and how to build such classifiers from information in the literature. As a case study, naive Bayesian classifiers to discriminate between classical swine fever (CSF)-infected and non-infected pig herds were constructed from data collected during the 1997/1998 CSF epidemic in the Netherlands. The resulting classifiers were studied in terms of their accuracy and compared with the optimally efficient diagnostic rule that was reported earlier by Elbers et al. (2002). The classifiers were found to have accuracies within the range of 67-70% and performed comparable to or even better than the diagnostic rule on the available data. In contrast with the diagnostic rule, the classifiers had the advantage of taking both the presence and the absence of particular clinical signs into account, which resulted in more discriminative power. These results indicate that naive Bayesian classifiers are promising tools for solving diagnostic problems in the veterinary field.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20817220/