PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Contact Pressure Under Traditional Foam and Novel Thermoplastic Elastomer Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Interfaces.

Year:
2026
Authors:
Shuler MS et al.
Affiliation:
Athens Orthopedic Clinic · United States

Abstract

Negative pressure wound therapy relies on suction, commonly set to -125 mmHg, to evacuate wound fluid, but dysvascular and pressure injuries often respond unpredictably. Newton's third law indicates that negative pressure applies an equal and opposite contact pressure on the wound surface, and this study quantified this contact pressure across dressing types, wound configurations and suction levels. Using a porcine explant model, central and peripheral contact pressure measurements were obtained beneath black reticulated open cell foam, white foam and a novel thermoplastic elastomer dressing across plexiglass, intact skin, shallow and deep wounds under -50, -75 and -125 mmHg. Contact pressure increased proportionally with negative pressure, and multivariable modelling demonstrated that dressing type, wound type and suction level significantly influenced pressure, with negative pressure explaining most of the variance (0.77 and 0.68). Thermoplastic elastomer at -50 mmHg in deep wounds produced the lowest contact pressure, whereas black reticulated open cell foam and white foam at -125 mmHg generated elevated contact pressures of approximately +125 to +195 mmHg. These findings show that black reticulated open cell foam at conventional -125 mmHg can create hypoperfusion conditions, whereas thermoplastic elastomer consistently produces the lowest pressures and may enhance perfusion at lower suction levels, offering a physiologic explanation for improved clinical outcomes in dysvascular and pressure injuries treated with reduced negative pressure.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication: https://europepmc.org/article/MED/41992494