Corneal Nerve Morphology in Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: A Meta-Analysis of In Vivo Confocal Microscopy Studies.

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (pDPN) significantly impacts quality of life, yet its diagnosis remains challenging due to reliance on subjective pain reports and limited objective biomarkers. This meta-analysis evaluated corneal nerve morphology parameters; corneal nerve fibre length (CNFL), corneal nerve fibre density (CNFD), and corneal nerve branch density (CNBD), measured through in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM), as potential tools for differentiating painful and painless forms of diabetic neuropathy. <b>Methods:</b> A systematic review was performed comparing corneal nerve morphology across four groups: painful diabetic neuropathy (pDPN), non-painful diabetic neuropathy (npDPN), diabetes without neuropathy (DPN-), and healthy controls. Literature search extended over MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, focusing on studies published since 2000. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, while evidence certainly followed GRADE guidelines. Random-effects meta-analyses calculated mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for CNFL, CNFD, and CNBD. <b>Results:</b> Seven observational studies comprising 803 participants (213 pDPN, 275 npDPN, 99 DPN-, and 216 controls) revealed no significant differences between pDPN and npDPN groups in CNFL (MD = 0.79, 95% CI -0.64 to 2.22), CNFD (MD = 1.67, 95% CI -0.14 to 3.47), or CNBD (MD = 1.84, 95% CI -4.31 to 7.98). However, all metrics were markedly reduced in pDPN compared to DPN- and healthy controls. <b>Conclusions:</b> While effective in identifying diabetic neuropathy, common corneal nerve morphology parameters cannot reliably distinguish pDPN from npDPN. This highlights the need for research into mechanisms like central sensitization, inflammation, and micro-neuromas, which could refine diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for pDPN.