PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Improving healing after dog flexor tendon repair with lubricant

By Zhao, Chunfeng et al.·Published in Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2014·Department of Orthopedic Surgery, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: CORR® ORS Richard A. Brand Award for Outstanding Orthopaedic Research: Engineering flexor tendon repair with lubricant, cells, and cytokines in a canine model.

Species:
dog
Movement & jointsDogs

Plain-English summary

A group of 60 dogs had their flexor tendons surgically repaired after being lacerated, and some received a special treatment to help with healing. The treated tendons showed fewer adhesions (which can cause pain and limit movement) compared to those that did not receive treatment. Over time, the treated tendons also had better movement and less friction, indicating improved healing. This suggests that using tissue engineering techniques can lead to better recovery outcomes for dogs with tendon injuries.

People also search for: dog tendon injury treatment · flexor tendon repair in dogs · how to help my dog's tendon heal

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adhesions and poor healing are complications of flexor tendon repair. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purpose of this study was to investigate a tissue engineering approach to improve functional outcomes after flexor tendon repair in a canine model. METHODS: Flexor digitorum profundus tendons were lacerated and repaired in 60 dogs that were followed for 10, 21, or 42 days. One randomly selected repair from either the second or fifth digit in one paw in each dog was treated with carbodiimide-derivatized hyaluronic acid, gelatin, and lubricin plus autologous bone marrow stromal cells stimulated with growth and differentiation factor 5; control repair tendons were not treated. Digits were analyzed by adhesion score, work of flexion, tendon-pulley friction, failure force, and histology. RESULTS: In the control group, 35 of 52 control tendons had adhesions, whereas 19 of 49 treated tendons had adhesions. The number of repaired tendons with adhesions in the control group was greater than the number in the treated group at all three times (p = 0.005). The normalized work of flexion in treated tendons was 0.28 (&#xb1; 0.08), 0.29 (&#xb1; 0.19), and 0.32 (&#xb1; 0.22) N/mm/&#xb0; at Day 10, Day 21, and Day 42 respectively, compared with the untreated tendons of 0.46 (&#xb1; 0.19) at Day 10 (effect size, 1.5; p = 0.01), 0.77 (&#xb1; 0.49) at Day 21 (effect size, 1.4; p < 0.001), and 1.17 (&#xb1; 0.82) N/mm/&#xb0; at Day 42 (effect size, 1.6; p < 0.001). The friction data were comparable to the work of flexion data at all times. The repaired tendon failure force in the untreated group at 42 days was 70.2 N (&#xb1; 8.77), which was greater than the treated tendons 44.7 N (&#xb1; 8.53) (effect size, 1.9; p < 0.001). Histologically, treated repairs had a smooth surface with intrinsic healing, whereas control repairs had surface adhesions and extrinsic healing. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides evidence that tissue engineering coupled with restoration of tendon gliding can improve the quality of tendon healing in a large animal in vivo model. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Tissue engineering may enhance intrinsic tendon healing and thus improve the functional outcomes of flexor tendon repair.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24906811/