PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

CT scan signs linked to lymph node spread in dogs with mast cell

By Miyagi, Hiroshi et al.·Published in Veterinary and comparative oncology·2024·The Department of Clinical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Correlation between computed tomography and histological evaluation of nodal metastasis in dogs with mast cell tumours.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of dogs with mast cell tumors (a type of skin cancer) underwent surgery to remove their tumors and nearby lymph nodes. Before surgery, they had a CT scan to check for cancer spread to the lymph nodes. The study found that while CT scans can help identify metastasis (cancer spread), they are not very reliable on their own, with only about 36% sensitivity. However, combining different CT scan features improved the chances of detecting metastasis accurately. This means that while CT scans are useful, they should be used alongside other methods for the best results.

People also search for: dog mast cell tumor treatment · dog lymph node cancer symptoms · CT scan for dog cancer detection

Abstract

Early diagnosis of nodal metastasis has been shown to impact prognosis for dogs with mast cell tumours (MCT). The objective of this retrospective study was to determine the correlation between computed tomographic characteristics of lymph nodes and histologic nodal metastasis using the HN classification system, in dogs with cutaneous or subcutaneous MCT and regional lymph node(s) removal. Dogs that had removal of MCT and regional lymphadenectomy within 31 days of the initial staging computed tomography (CT) were enrolled. Subjective lymph node characteristics used included margination, loss of fat at hilus, shape of margin, perinodal fat pattern, increase in number of nodes, and pre- and post-contrast heterogeneity. Enhancement, heterogeneity, and short-long axis ratio were calculated. Seventy-one lymph nodes from 37 dogs were included. Generalised linear mixed model of assessment of lymph node was performed twice, with binary outcome [non-metastatic (HN0/1) versus metastatic (HN2/3)] and 4-point scales (HN0-HN3). After blind assessment of 7 characteristics described above, a final subjective interpretation of each lymph node as non-metastatic or metastatic was assigned. A significant correlation was found between final interpretation and prediction of metastasis. Higher HN classification was also significantly correlated with the increased number of nodes and pre- and post-contrast heterogeneity. No correlation was found in short-long axis ratio, calculated heterogeneity, or degree of enhancement. Sensitivity of CT was 35.7%, specificity was 96.6%, and accuracy was 60.5% for nodal metastasis. CT alone cannot be recommended for assessment of metastasis. The use of multiple computed tomographic characteristics may increase accuracy of nodal metastasis detection.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38043517/