Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Pain and skin reaction scores in dogs after forelimb cancer radiation
By Carsten, Ronald E et al.·Published in Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia·2008·Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Correlations between acute radiation scores and pain scores in canine radiation patients with cancer of the forelimb.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of seven middle-aged dogs with cancer in their front legs underwent surgery followed by radiation therapy. As their treatment progressed, the dogs experienced varying levels of pain, which were measured using pain scales. The study found that as the skin condition worsened due to radiation, the dogs' pain levels increased as well. This information can help veterinarians better manage pain by predicting when a dog might need more pain relief during radiation therapy.
People also search for: dog cancer pain management · radiation therapy side effects in dogs · how to help my dog with cancer pain
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there is a correlation between skin acute radiation score (ARS) and pain scores and to determine if skin ARSs can be used to predict future pain scores and increased need for analgesia in dogs undergoing radiation therapy for cancer of the forelimb. Study design Prospective observational study. ANIMALS: Seven middle-aged dogs of various breeds with cancer of the forelimb. METHODS: Each neoplasm was surgically removed and a histologic diagnosis was obtained. Curative intent radiation therapy was initiated 2(1/2)-4(1/2) weeks after surgery. Curative intent radiation therapy was delivered as prescribed. Two trained observers scored the dogs using a visual analog pain scale (VAS), Glasgow composite measure of pain scale, short form (GCMPS) and skin ARS prior to each day's therapy. Daily scores were averaged and scatter plots were developed. Generalized estimating equation regressions were used to calculate standard error, 95% confidence interval, and p-values for each relationship. Confidence and prediction bands were plotted. RESULTS: A statistically significant correlation between skin ARS and VAS and GCMPS pain scores was identified indicating that as the skin ARS increased so did the pain scores. A general correlation between VAS and GCMPS scores was observed. Early (fraction days 1-6) GCMPS scores were significantly influenced by anxiety behavior unrelated to pain. Skin ARS was found to predict precisely current and future presence of pain, but could only predict a range of potential future pain scores based on the pain management approach in use during this study. CONCLUSIONS: Skin ARS can provide valuable information for initiating preemptive analgesia and intensifying pain management during curative intent radiation therapy. Daily pain scoring with an acceptable pain scale should be used in conjunction with the skin ARS to improve patient pain management. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Pain is an anticipated consequence of curative intent radiation therapy. Understanding the correlation between pain and skin ARS may facilitate more effective pain management.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18466168/