Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Cross-contamination risks in limited-antigen wet diets for dogs
By Pagani, Elena et al.·Published in BMC veterinary research·2018·Department of Veterinary Sciences, Italy·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Cross-contamination in canine and feline dietetic limited-antigen wet diets.
Plain-English summary
A study found that more than half of the limited-antigen wet diets for dogs and cats contained undeclared animal proteins that could trigger adverse food reactions (AFRs). Out of 11 tested diets, 6 showed contamination with animal proteins not listed on the label, which could lead to ineffective elimination diets for pets with food sensitivities. This means that if your pet is on a limited-antigen diet to manage food allergies, it might not be as safe as you think. It's important to discuss this with your veterinarian to ensure your pet is getting the right food without hidden allergens.
People also search for: dog food allergies · cat limited-antigen diet · contaminated pet food · adverse food reactions in pets · how to choose safe pet food
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Adverse food reactions (AFRs) are defined as abnormal responses to an ingested food or food additive. Diagnosis and treatment of AFRs consist of the complete elimination of these ingredients in the dietary trial. Previous studies have demonstrated the presence of undeclared ingredients in commercial limited-antigen dry food diets that can compromise the results and efficacy of dietary elimination trails. The aim of this study was to assess a selection of commercial canine and feline dietetic limited-antigen wet foods for the potential cross-contamination of animal proteins from origins not mentioned on the label. RESULTS: Eleven canine and feline dietetic limited-antigen wet foods (9 novel animal protein foods, 1 vegetarian and 1 hydrolyzed) were analyzed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect the presence DNA of animal and vegetal origins. PCR analysis confirmed the contamination of 6 of the 11 (54.5%) limited-antigen wet diets with undeclared animal protein. One of these 6 diets was solely composed of animal protein sources completely unrelated to those declared on the label. None of the foods containing horse meat or fish were contaminated, and neither were the vegetarian or the hydrolyzed food products. Moreover, the results show that had zoological class primers only been used to check for cross-class contaminations, as are generally used in the pet food industry for in-house checks, the apparent contamination rate would have been significantly underestimated: less than 20% (3/11), instead of the actual rate of 54.7% using species-specific primers. CONCLUSION: This study reveals a high rate of cross-contamination in dietetic limited-antigen wet canine and feline foods, as previously described for dietetic dry limited-antigen foods (reported to be more than 80%). These results add new fuel to the discussion about the potential causes underlying the failure of elimination diets, since animal protein contaminants may actually be present in the commercial dietetic limited-antigen diets. AFRs may therefore occur as a result of inadequate practices in the pet food industry.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30208880/