Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Allergy test cross-reactions in dogs with skin allergies
By Buckley, Laura et al.·Published in Veterinary dermatology·2013·The University of Liverpool School of Veterinary Science, United Kingdom·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Cross-reaction and co-sensitization among related and unrelated allergens in canine intradermal tests.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 651 dogs with itchy skin due to atopic dermatitis underwent intradermal allergy tests to identify specific allergens causing their symptoms. The tests revealed that many allergens, particularly those from similar groups like tree and grass pollens, showed a strong likelihood of cross-reaction, meaning that if a dog is allergic to one, it may also react to others in the same category. This information can help veterinarians choose the right allergens for treatment and immunotherapy. However, more research is needed to fully understand these relationships.
People also search for: dog itching allergy test · atopic dermatitis treatment for dogs · dog pollen allergies
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Intradermal tests are used to identify allergens for avoidance and immunotherapy in atopic dogs. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: To evaluate cross-reaction or co-sensitization among 53 intradermal test allergens. ANIMALS: Six hundred and fifty-one client-owned dogs with atopic dermatitis. METHODS: Intradermal tests were performed with 53 house dust/storage mite, epidermal, insect, tree, weed and grass pollen and mould allergens. Pairwise comparisons were used to calculate the odds ratios (ORs), 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and statistical significance for the results of each allergen pair, with significance at P < 0.0006 (Holm-Bonferroni correction to reduce the false-detection rate). RESULTS: Apart from cotton, cockroach, red clover, grain smut and Penicillium, the results for the allergens within each group were statistically associated [ORs from 4.7 (CI 2.5-8.9) to 1229.4 (CI 166.5-1795.1); P = 0.0005 to P < 0.0001]. Excluding red clover and cotton, 94% of results between tree, weed and grass pollens were also statistically associated [ORs from 8.3 (CI 3.6-24.7) to 117 (CI 29.1-341); P = 0.0005 to P < 0.0001]. In contrast, few allergens from unrelated groups were statistically associated [ORs from 0.12 (CI 0.03-1.1) to 27.7 (CI 0.2-93); P = 1.0 to P < 0.0001]. The mean (SD) of the log e transformed ORs for the related and statistically associated allergens [5.3 (1.3)] was significantly greater than those for related but nonstatistically associated [1.7 (1.6)] or unrelated allergens [1.4 (1.4); P < 0.0001]. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: This suggests that there is cross-reaction or co-sensitization between related allergens. This could have implications for allergen selection in testing and immunotherapy, but further studies are required to differentiate cross-reaction from co-sensitization.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23745529/