PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Cryopreserved platelet transfusions in 43 thrombocytopenic dogs

By Ng, Zenithson Y et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001)·2016·Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Cryopreserved platelet concentrate transfusions in 43 dogs: a retrospective study (2007-2013).

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of 43 dogs with low platelet counts (thrombocytopenia) received a special treatment called cryopreserved platelet concentrate (cPC) transfusion to help improve their condition. While the treatment did increase their platelet counts, it did not lead to better outcomes in terms of reducing bleeding or increasing survival compared to dogs that did not receive the transfusion. Fortunately, none of the dogs experienced any immediate reactions to the transfusion. More research is needed to understand when this treatment might be beneficial for dogs with low platelet counts.

People also search for: dog low platelet count treatment · thrombocytopenia in dogs · cryopreserved platelet transfusion for dogs

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To clinically characterize a group of thrombocytopenic dogs that received cryopreserved platelet concentrate (cPC) transfusion, assess efficacy of cPC treatment in improving patient outcome, and compare treated dogs to a control population of thrombocytopenic dogs that did not receive cPC transfusions. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: University teaching hospital. ANIMALS: Eighty-six client-owned dogs (43 in treatment group, 43 in control group). INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Medical records of thrombocytopenic dogs that received cPC transfusions and those of thrombocytopenic dogs that did not receive cPC (control population) from January 2007 through March 2013 were reviewed. Dogs receiving cPC were statistically more likely than controls to have a platelet trigger for cPC transfusion (P = 0.01), lower platelet count (P = 0.009) and hematocrit at presentation (P = 0.001), and lower hematocrit after cPC (P = 0.02). Although there was a statistically significant increase in platelet count from pre- to post-cPC transfusion (P = 0.002), cPC was not found to be effective in improving clinical bleeding or increasing survival compared to the control group. No other characteristics were statistically different between groups. No dogs receiving cPC had an acute transfusion reaction during hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: In the population described in this study, cPC was not found to increase survival, but was well tolerated. Controlled, prospective studies are necessary to determine indications for and efficacy of cPC transfusions.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27376965/