Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Outcomes and treatment of 103 dog growth plate fractures
By Currie, Alex J & Meeson, Richard·Published in The Veterinary record·2022·Small Animal Teaching Hospital, United Kingdom·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Demography, management and outcomes of canine physeal fractures (103 cases).
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of dogs with leg fractures, particularly in the elbow and knee areas, were treated to see how well they healed. Most dogs had fair to good outcomes, especially those with fractures in the elbow, where healing was more successful. However, many dogs had complications that required the removal of surgical implants used during treatment. The study highlights that while some dogs healed well, ongoing growth was not always supported by removing implants as recommended.
People also search for: dog leg fracture treatment · elbow fracture in dogs · dog surgery implant removal complications
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study is a retrospective review of the demography, management, complications and outcomes of canine physeal fractures. METHODS: Clinical records were reviewed for dogs with appendicular physeal fractures, and descriptive statistical analysis was applied to the data set. RESULTS: One hundred and three fractures were included, of which 68 had follow-up. Fractures of the distal humerus were the most common (n = 57), followed by proximal tibial fractures (n = 16). Outcome was fair for most fractures at all locations, aside from the distal humerus, where most outcomes were good. At radiographic follow-up, most physes were closed at all locations aside from the distal tibia. Implant removal to allow ongoing physeal growth was performed in only 3/18 (17%) fractures, in 15/18 (83%) implant removal related to complications. LIMITATIONS: Only short-term follow-up data were present, and hence it is not possible to give a longer term indication of return to function. CONCLUSIONS: The management and demography of canine physeal fractures have evolved considerably from previous publications. Routine implant removal to allow ongoing growth was not regularly performed at all locations in this cohort.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36264666/