PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Detecting Clostridium perfringens in stool of healthy and diarrheic

By Goldstein, Michael R et al.·Published in Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire·2012·Department of Clinical Studies, Canada·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Detection and characterization of Clostridium perfringens in the feces of healthy and diarrheic dogs.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A study found that Clostridium perfringens, a bacteria often linked to diarrhea, was present in the feces of both healthy and diarrheic dogs. Researchers collected samples from 105 healthy dogs and 54 dogs with diarrhea, discovering that the bacteria was common in both groups. While the bacteria was found in a high percentage of samples, the presence of specific toxin genes did not significantly differ between healthy and sick dogs. This suggests that just finding C. perfringens in a dog's stool may not be enough to diagnose diarrhea, as it can also be present in healthy dogs.

People also search for: dog diarrhea causes · Clostridium perfringens in dogs · dog stool test results

Abstract

Clostridium perfringens has been implicated as a cause of diarrhea in dogs. The objectives of this study were to compare 2 culture methods and to evaluate a multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay to detect C. perfringens toxin genes alpha (α), beta (β ), beta 2 (β2), epsilon (ɛ), iota (ι), and C. perfringens enterotoxin (cpe) from canine isolates. Fecal samples were collected from clinically normal non-diarrheic (ND) dogs, (n = 105) and diarrheic dogs (DD, n = 54). Clostridium perfringens was isolated by directly inoculating stool onto 5% sheep blood agar (SBA) and enrichment in brain-heart infusion (BHI) broth, followed by inoculation onto SBA. Isolates were tested by multiplex PCR for the presence of α, β, β2, ɛ, ι, and cpe genes. C. perfringens was isolated from 84% of ND samples using direct culture and from 87.6% with enrichment (P = 0.79). In the DD group, corresponding isolation rates were 90.7% and 93.8% (P = 0.65). All isolates possessed the α toxin gene. Beta (β), β2, ɛ, ι, and cpe toxin genes were identified in 4.5%, 1.1%, 3.4%, 1.1%, and 14.8% of ND isolates, respectively. In the DD group, β and β2 were identified in 5%, ɛ and ι were not identified, and the cpe gene was identified in 16.9% of isolates. Enrichment with BHI broth did not significantly increase the yield of C. perfringens, but it did increase the time and cost of the procedure. C. perfringens toxin genes were present in equal proportions in both the ND and DD groups (P ≤ 0.15 to 0.6). Within the parameters of this study, culture of C. perfringens and PCR for toxin genes is of limited diagnostic usefulness due to its high prevalence in normal dogs and the lack of apparent difference in the distribution of toxin genes between normal and diarrheic dogs.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23277693/