Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Detecting Lyme disease bacteria DNA in dog tissues with PCR test
By Chou, Jaime et al.·Published in Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association·2006·Department of Veterinary Population Medicine, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Detection of Borrelia burgdorferi DNA in tissues from dogs with presumptive Lyme borreliosis.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of dogs suspected to have Lyme disease (caused by the bacteria Borrelia burgdorferi) had tissue samples tested to see if the bacteria's DNA could be found. Out of 58 dogs, only 4 showed positive results for the bacteria's DNA, and just one of those had kidney tissue that tested positive. This suggests that while Lyme disease can affect dogs, finding the actual DNA in their tissues is quite rare. The study indicates that Lyme-related kidney issues might not be caused directly by the bacteria but could be due to the dog's immune response instead.
People also search for: dog Lyme disease symptoms · Lyme nephritis treatment · how to test for Lyme disease in dogs
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To develop a quantitative PCR assay for detection of Borrelia burgdorferi DNA in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues; compare results of this assay with results of immunohistochemical staining of tissues from seropositive dogs; and determine whether B burgdorferi DNA could be detected in renal tissues from dogs with presumptive Lyme nephritis. DESIGN: Cohort study. SAMPLE POPULATION: Archived tissue samples from 58 dogs. PROCEDURES: A quantitative PCR assay was performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections from the dogs. Results were compared with results of immunohistochemical staining, B burgdorferi serostatus, clinical signs, and necropsy findings. RESULTS: 38 dogs were classified as having positive or equivocal results for Lyme borreliosis, and 20 were classified as having negative results on the basis of clinical signs, serologic findings, and pathologic abnormalities. Borrelia burgdorferi DNA was amplified from tissue samples from only 4 (7%) dogs, all of which had been classified as having positive or equivocal results for Lyme borreliosis and had signs of presumptive Lyme nephritis. Results of PCR assays of renal tissue were positive for only 1 dog, and there was no agreement between results of immunohistochemical staining (ie, detection of B burgdorferi antigen) and results of the PCR assay (ie, detection of B burgdorferi DNA) for renal tissues. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Results indicated that detection of B burgdorferi DNA in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues is feasible, but that intact B burgdorferi DNA is rarely found in tissues from naturally infected dogs, even tissues from dogs with presumptive Lyme borreliosis. Further, findings support the contention that Lyme nephritis may be a sterile, immune complex disease.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17042727/