PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

How can I detect heartworm in my dog's blood?

By Lavabre, Typhaine et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc·2021·D&#xe9, France·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Detection of circulating microfilariae in canine EDTA blood using lens-free technology: preliminary results.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of dogs with heart disease caused by a parasite called heartworm had their blood tested using a new imaging technology that can detect tiny organisms. The tests showed that the technology was able to find microfilariae (the larval stage of heartworms) in nearly all cases from affected dogs, while no microfilariae were found in healthy dogs or those with other blood issues. This new method could help veterinarians screen for heartworm infections more effectively, as it showed no false negatives, meaning it didn't miss any cases.

People also search for: dog heartworm symptoms · how to test for heartworm in dogs · heartworm treatment for dogs

Abstract

causes life-threatening heart disease in dogs, thus screening of dog populations is important. Lens-free technology (LFT) is a low-cost imaging technique based on light diffraction that allows computerized recognition of small objects in holographic images. We evaluated an algorithm capable of recognizing microfilariae in canine whole blood using the LFT. We examined 3 groups of 10 EDTA blood specimens, from dogs with microfilaremia (group A), healthy dogs (B), and dogs with hematologic modifications other than microfilaremia (C). The LFT analyzer photographed repeated series of 5 images of all samples. The algorithm declared a sample positive if a microfilaria was detected on ≥1, ≥2, or ≥3 of the 5 images of a series. Microfilariae were detected visually in the images in 9 of 10 cases in group A; no microfilariae were seen in the images from groups B and C. Of the 30 cases, there were 14, 4, and only 3 false-positives with the 1 of 5, 2 of 5, and 3 of 5 image cutoffs, respectively. There were no false-negatives, regardless of cutoff. LFT seems useful for detecting microfilaria and could have application in clinical pathology.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33733938/