PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Detection of Wolbachia DNA in blood for diagnosing filaria-associated syndromes in cats.

Journal:
Journal of clinical microbiology
Year:
2012
Authors:
Turba, Maria Elena et al.
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences · Italy
Species:
cat

Plain-English summary

Researchers have been studying a type of bacteria called Wolbachia, which lives inside certain parasites that can infect cats, particularly the heartworm parasite Dirofilaria immitis. In this study, scientists tested 307 cats, some healthy and some with health issues, to see if they could find Wolbachia DNA in their blood as a way to help diagnose illnesses related to these parasites. They found that cats with Wolbachia in their blood were more likely to show respiratory problems, with nearly 30% of those cats having breathing issues compared to just under 10% of the others. The results suggest that a specific blood test could be useful for detecting this bacteria in cats that are having trouble breathing. Overall, the study indicates that this test could help identify cats affected by these parasitic infections.

Abstract

A fundamental role for the endosymbiotic bacteria Wolbachia pipientis in the pathogenesis of Dirofilaria immitis infections has emerged in recent years. Diagnostic opportunities arising from this breakthrough have not yet been fully exploited. This study was aimed at developing conventional and real-time PCR assays to carry out a molecular survey in a convenience sample of cats living in an area where D. immitis is endemic and to evaluate the detection of bacterial DNA in blood as a surrogate assay for diagnosing filaria-associated syndromes in cats. COI and FtsZ loci were used as targets for D. immitis and Wolbachia PCR assays, respectively, and real-time TaqMan PCR assays were used only for Wolbachia. A convenience sample of 307 disease-affected or healthy cats examined at a University facility were PCR tested, and their medical records were investigated. Conventional nested PCR for Wolbachia amplified the endosymbionts of both D. immitis and D. repens, while real-time PCR was highly specific only for the former. Observed prevalences of 0.3 and 10.4% were found using conventional nested PCR assays for D. immitis and real-time PCR for Wolbachia, respectively. Similar prevalences were established using the Wolbachia nested PCR (98% concordance with real-time PCR). The group of Wolbachia-positive samples had a significantly higher proportion of subjects with respiratory signs (29.0% versus 9.7%; P = 0.002). The findings of this study indicate that a highly sensitive PCR assay can be used to detect the Wolbachia organism in the peripheral blood of cats with respiratory signs.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22649020/