Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Testing for Wolbachia DNA in cats to diagnose filaria infections
By Turba, Maria Elena et al.·Published in Journal of clinical microbiology·2012·Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences, Italy·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Detection of Wolbachia DNA in blood for diagnosing filaria-associated syndromes in cats.
- Species:
- cat
Plain-English summary
A group of cats with respiratory problems was tested for a type of bacteria called Wolbachia, which is linked to heartworm infections. Researchers developed new tests to detect this bacteria in the blood, finding that cats with Wolbachia were more likely to show respiratory symptoms. Out of 307 cats tested, about 10% had the bacteria, and those with it had a higher chance of having breathing issues. This means that testing for Wolbachia could help diagnose respiratory problems related to heartworm in cats.
People also search for: cat respiratory problems · heartworm symptoms in cats · Wolbachia testing for cats
Abstract
A fundamental role for the endosymbiotic bacteria Wolbachia pipientis in the pathogenesis of Dirofilaria immitis infections has emerged in recent years. Diagnostic opportunities arising from this breakthrough have not yet been fully exploited. This study was aimed at developing conventional and real-time PCR assays to carry out a molecular survey in a convenience sample of cats living in an area where D. immitis is endemic and to evaluate the detection of bacterial DNA in blood as a surrogate assay for diagnosing filaria-associated syndromes in cats. COI and FtsZ loci were used as targets for D. immitis and Wolbachia PCR assays, respectively, and real-time TaqMan PCR assays were used only for Wolbachia. A convenience sample of 307 disease-affected or healthy cats examined at a University facility were PCR tested, and their medical records were investigated. Conventional nested PCR for Wolbachia amplified the endosymbionts of both D. immitis and D. repens, while real-time PCR was highly specific only for the former. Observed prevalences of 0.3 and 10.4% were found using conventional nested PCR assays for D. immitis and real-time PCR for Wolbachia, respectively. Similar prevalences were established using the Wolbachia nested PCR (98% concordance with real-time PCR). The group of Wolbachia-positive samples had a significantly higher proportion of subjects with respiratory signs (29.0% versus 9.7%; P = 0.002). The findings of this study indicate that a highly sensitive PCR assay can be used to detect the Wolbachia organism in the peripheral blood of cats with respiratory signs.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22649020/