PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

New quick scoring tool for dog skin allergy severity

By Plant, Jon D. et al.·Published in Veterinary Dermatology·2012·View original on Crossref

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Development and validation of the Canine Atopic Dermatitis Lesion Index, a scale for the rapid scoring of lesion severity in canine atopic dermatitis

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of 57 dogs with atopic dermatitis (a common skin allergy) were evaluated using a new scoring system called the Canine Atopic Dermatitis Lesion Index (CADLI) to measure the severity of their skin lesions. This new method was found to be effective and much quicker to use than the previous standard, taking less than 2 minutes compared to over 12 minutes for the older method. The CADLI scores were closely related to the severity of itching and overall assessment of the dogs' skin conditions. This means that veterinarians can now assess skin problems in dogs more efficiently while still getting accurate results.

People also search for: dog skin allergy treatment · atopic dermatitis in dogs · how to treat dog itching

Abstract

Background – The third iteration of the Canine Atopic Dermatitis Extent and Severity Index (CADESI‐03) is the only tool rigorously validated for canine atopic dermatitis (CAD) lesion scoring. The CADESI‐03 requires 248 evaluations, limiting its widespread use.Hypothesis/Objectives – The goal of the study was to develop and validate a practical method of grading CAD lesions that requires scoring only the frequently affected body regions.Animals – Fifty‐seven privately owned atopic dogs were used in the study.Methods – The Canine Atopic Dermatitis Lesion Index (CADLI) was evaluated in an open, multicentre reliability study. Validity was assessed with expert opinion (content validity) and comparison of CADLI with existing disease severity measures (construct and criterion validity). Reliability was evaluated by analysing repeated observations of each dog. Convenience was assessed in terms of the time required to complete the scale.Results – The CADLI scores correlated with overall assessment scores (r = 0.60,P < 0.001, linear mixed model) and pruritus severity scores (r = 0.53,P < 0.001, linear mixed model), establishing construct validity. The CADLI was strongly correlated with CADESI‐03 (r = 0.84,P < 0.001, linear mixed model), establishing criterion validity. The CADLI values obtained by two observers correlated very strongly (r = 0.91,P < 0.001), as did the repeat values for the same observer (r = 0.98,P < 0.001). The mean time to complete the CADLI was less than that required for CADESI‐03 (1.9 and 12.6 min, respectively), a highly significant difference (P < 0.001).Conclusion and clinical importance – The CADLI was found to be an effective measure of CAD lesion severity, strongly correlating with CADESI‐03. The convenience of CADLI makes it suitable for use in both clinical research and practice.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on Crossref: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3164.2012.01113.x