Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Treatment protocol for Indian cobra snake bites in dogs
By Adhikari, Ranjith et al.·Published in Toxins·2020·Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Development of a Treatment Protocol for Cobra () Bite Envenoming in Dogs.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of dogs in Sri Lanka suffered from cobra bites and showed symptoms like pain and swelling at the bite site, as well as breathing problems and other neurotoxic signs. Researchers studied 116 cases over six years and found that most dogs needed treatment with Indian polyvalent antivenom, with the number of vials varying based on the severity of their symptoms. While many dogs improved, some experienced side effects like wheezing and hypersalivation, and a few developed serious complications, including kidney injury. Unfortunately, a small percentage of the dogs did not survive despite treatment.
People also search for: dog cobra bite treatment · symptoms of snake bite in dogs · antivenom for dog snake bites
Abstract
There is limited information on clinical profiles, treatment, and management aspects of Indian cobra () bite envenoming in dogs in Sri Lanka. Dogs with cobra bites presented to the Veterinary Teaching Hospital (VTH), University of Peradeniya, were prospectively studied over a period of 72 months; local and systemic clinical manifestations and hematological abnormalities were recorded. We studied 116 cobra bite envenomings in dogs. A grading system was established using a combination of anatomical site of fang marks, as well as local and systemic clinical manifestations. Accordingly, treatment strategies were established using Indian polyvalent antivenom (AVS). Pain and swelling at the bite site were major clinical signs observed, while neurotoxic manifestations (mydriasis, wheezing, and crackles) were detected in most dogs. Leukocytosis was observed in 78% of them. Statistical analysis revealed that the grading scores obtained were compatible to initiate AVS administration according to the severity. The minimum number required was 2 AVS vials (range 2-12). Almost 20% of the dogs developed wheezing, crackles, hypersalivation, restlessness, and dyspnea as adverse reactions to AVS treatment. Necrotic wounds on bitten anatomical sites developed in 19% of the dogs and 2.5% developed acute kidney injuries as a consequence of envenoming crisis. Despite treatment, 3% of dogs died. No dry bites were recorded.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33147770/