PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Development of reverse transcription recombinase polymerase amplification assay for avian influenza H5N1 HA gene detection.

Journal:
Journal of virological methods
Year:
2015
Authors:
Yehia, Nahed et al.
Affiliation:
Animal Health Research Institute
Species:
bird

Plain-English summary

In 2006, outbreaks of the H5N1 strain of avian influenza in Egypt caused major problems for poultry production and raised concerns for public health. Researchers developed a new test called the H5 RT-RPA assay, which can quickly detect this virus's genetic material. This test can identify the virus in just 7 minutes, while the traditional method, real-time RT-PCR, takes at least 90 minutes. Both tests were found to be equally effective in identifying the virus, with a 100% success rate in samples tested. Overall, the H5 RT-RPA assay is faster and easier to use than the standard testing method.

Abstract

The 2006 outbreaks of H5N1 avian influenza in Egypt interrupted poultry production and caused staggering economic damage. In addition, H5N1 avian influenza viruses represent a significant threat to public health. Therefore, the rapid detection of H5 viruses is very important in order to control the disease. In this study, a qualitative reverse transcription recombinase polymerase amplification (RT-RPA) assay for the detection of hemagglutinin gene of H5 subtype influenza viruses was developed. The results were compared to the real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). An in vitro transcribed RNA standard of 970 nucleotides of the hemagglutinin gene was developed and used to determine the assay sensitivity. The developed H5 RT-RPA assay was able to detect one RNA molecule within 7 min, while in real-time RT-PCR, at least 90 min was required. H5 RT-RPA assay did not detect nucleic acid extracted from H5 negative samples or from other pathogens producing respiratory manifestation in poultry. The clinical performance of the H5 RT-RPA assay was tested in 30 samples collected between 2014 and 2015; the sensitivity of H5 RT-RPA and real-time RT-PCR was 100%. In conclusion, H5 RT-RPA was faster than real-time RT-PCR and easily operable in a portable device. Moreover, it had an equivalent sensitivity and specificity.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26225482/