Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Accuracy of rapid cortisol test for diagnosing Addison's disease
By Torrano Guillamón, Ana et al.·Published in American journal of veterinary research·2025·AniCura Valencia Sur Veterinary Hospital, Spain·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Diagnostic performance of an in-clinic cortisol assay in dogs with suspected hypoadrenocorticism.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of dogs suspected of having low adrenal function (hypoadrenocorticism) were tested using a quick in-clinic cortisol test called SNAP, alongside a more detailed lab test. Out of 96 dogs, 21 were diagnosed with this condition. The SNAP test showed a strong agreement with the lab results, being very effective at identifying dogs with low cortisol levels. While the SNAP test was generally reliable, it sometimes gave slightly higher cortisol readings than the lab test, so any borderline results should be double-checked with the lab. Overall, the SNAP test can be a helpful tool for vets in urgent situations.
People also search for: dog low adrenal function test · hypoadrenocorticism diagnosis in dogs · SNAP cortisol test for dogs
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of the rapid point-of-care ELISA by IDEXX (SNAP) for detecting hypoadrenocorticism (HA) in dogs. A secondary aim was to evaluate the agreement between the SNAP and the veterinary reference laboratory (VRL) using chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (IMMULITE 2000) cortisol measurements. We hypothesized that the SNAP would correlate well with the VRL and aid in HA diagnosis. METHODS: A prospective observational diagnostic accuracy study was conducted from January 2023 through January 2024, enrolling dogs with suspected HA. Hypoadrenocorticism was diagnosed using an ACTH stimulation test, with basal serum cortisol (BSC) used for screening in some cases. Samples were analyzed by the SNAP and VRL, with the VRL serving as the gold standard. RESULTS: 96 dogs were enrolled; 21 were diagnosed with HA. The SNAP showed correlation with the VRL (Spearman ρ = 0.923; P < .001). Median BSC and post-ACTH cortisol concentrations did not differ significantly between methods. A BSC < 2 µg/dL yielded 100% sensitivity for both, with the SNAP showing higher specificity (73.1%) than the VRL (64.2%). Post-ACTH cortisol < 2 µg/dL was 100% specific by both methods, with 95.2% sensitivity using the SNAP. A 10.5% clinical discordance was observed. Passing-Bablok regression revealed proportional and constant bias, with the SNAP test tending to overestimate cortisol concentrations, but in the low cortisol range this overestimation appears minimal. CONCLUSIONS: The SNAP correlated with the VRL for HA diagnosis; however, borderline post-ACTH SNAP results should be confirmed with the VRL. The SNAP-derived BSC may be more specific than the VRL for ruling out HA. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The SNAP test aids HA diagnosis in urgent care.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40738156/