Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Detecting feline coronavirus in cat fluid to diagnose infectious
By Litster, A L et al.·Published in Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997)·2013·Purdue University College of Veterinary Medicine, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Diagnostic utility of a direct immunofluorescence test to detect feline coronavirus antigen in macrophages in effusive feline infectious peritonitis.
- Species:
- cat
Plain-English summary
A group of 17 cats with suspected feline infectious peritonitis (FIP) had fluid samples taken for testing. The new direct immunofluorescence (DIF) test was used to detect the feline coronavirus in these samples. After examining the cats postmortem, FIP was confirmed in 10 of them, and the DIF test was positive in all these cases. The test showed a high accuracy rate, making it a reliable option for diagnosing FIP before death. The results suggest that DIF testing could be a useful tool for veterinarians when diagnosing this serious condition in cats.
People also search for: cat FIP diagnosis · feline infectious peritonitis test · cat coronavirus symptoms · how to test for FIP in cats
Abstract
The antemortem diagnosis of feline infectious peritonitis (FIP) remains challenging in clinical practice, since current testing methods have suboptimal diagnostic accuracy. Immunohistochemical testing of biopsy specimens and postmortem examination are the standard diagnostic methods, although direct immunofluorescence (DIF) testing to detect feline coronavirus in macrophages in effusion specimens has been reported to have 100% specificity and has been recommended as an antemortem confirmatory test. The aim of this study was to compare the results of DIF testing in antemortem feline effusions with postmortem results using field samples. Effusion specimens were collected antemortem from 17 cats and tested by DIF, followed by postmortem examination. Histopathological examination of specimens collected at postmortem confirmed FIP in 10/17 cases and ruled out FIP out in 7/17 cases. Antemortem DIF testing was positive in all 10 cases confirmed as FIP at postmortem examination. In the seven cats where FIP was ruled out at postmortem examination, DIF was negative in five cases and positive in the remaining two cases. The calculated sensitivity of DIF testing was 100% and the specificity was 71.4%. Duplicate effusion specimens from eight cats that were initially DIF positive were stored refrigerated (4 °C) or at room temperature (22-25 °C) and subjected to serial DIF testing to determine the duration of positive results. DIF-positive specimens stored at both temperatures retained their positive status for at least 2 days.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24076123/