Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Diagnostic value of conjunctival swab sampling associated with nested PCR for different categories of dogs naturally exposed to Leishmania infantum infection.
- Journal:
- Journal of clinical microbiology
- Year:
- 2012
- Authors:
- Di Muccio, Trentina et al.
- Affiliation:
- MIPI Department · Italy
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
This study looked at a new, less invasive way to diagnose canine leishmaniasis (a disease caused by a parasite) in dogs using a conjunctival swab (a sample taken from the eye area) and a special test called nested PCR. Researchers tested 253 dogs in areas where the disease is common and found that this method was quite effective, especially in dogs that showed no symptoms and those that were sick. In a follow-up with 20 sick dogs receiving treatment, the conjunctival swab test was the most sensitive method for detecting the disease and could help predict if the dogs might have a relapse. The study also found that factors like age, breed size, living environment, and previous treatments were linked to the likelihood of infection. Overall, the conjunctival swab test appears to be a promising option for early diagnosis and monitoring of leishmaniasis in dogs.
Abstract
The objective of the present study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of a noninvasive assay, conjunctival swab (CS) nested-PCR (n-PCR), for diagnosing canine leishmaniasis (CanL) in different stages of infection in comparison to the performance of the indirect immunofluorescence antibody test (IFAT), lymph node microscopy, and buffy coat n-PCR. To this end, we performed a cross-sectional survey among 253 nonselected dogs in areas of endemicity in central Italy. We also performed a longitudinal study of CS n-PCR among 20 sick dogs undergoing antileishmanial treatment. In the first study, among the 72 animals that were positive by at least one test (28.45%), CS n-PCR showed the best relative performance (76.38%), with a high concordance in comparison to standard IFAT serology (κ = 0.75). The highest positivity rates using CS n-PCR were found in asymptomatic infected dogs (84.2%) and sick dogs (77.8%); however, the sensitivity of the assay was not associated with the presence of clinical signs. In the follow-up study on treated sick dogs, CS n-PCR was the most sensitive assay, with promising prognostic value for relapses. The univariate analysis of risk factors for CanL based on CS n-PCR findings showed a significant correlation with age (P = 0.012), breed size (P = 0.026), habitat (P = 4.9 × 10(-4)), and previous therapy (P = 0.014). Overall, the results indicated that CS n-PCR was the most sensitive assay of the less invasive diagnostic methods and could represent a good option for the early and simple diagnosis of CanL infection in asymptomatic animals and for monitoring relapses in drug-treated dogs.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22649018/