PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Are fecal cultures useful for diagnosing chronic diarrhea in dogs

By Werner, Melanie et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary internal medicine·2021·Clinic of Small Animal Internal Medicine, Germany·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Diagnostic value of fecal cultures in dogs with chronic diarrhea.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of 18 dogs with chronic diarrhea was tested to see if fecal cultures could help diagnose their condition. The results showed that while the dogs with diarrhea had a higher dysbiosis index (an indicator of gut imbalance), the fecal cultures did not reliably identify differences between sick and healthy dogs. In fact, the cultures from different laboratories showed a lot of variability and did not agree with the dysbiosis index results. This means that fecal cultures may not be a useful tool for diagnosing chronic diarrhea in dogs.

People also search for: dog chronic diarrhea treatment · fecal culture for dogs · dog gut health issues

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Culture-based assessment of the fecal microbiome using fecal culture profiles frequently is performed in dogs with chronic diarrhea, but the diagnostic value of this approach has not been determined. OBJECTIVES: To compare the reported results of fecal culture profiles and the polymerase chain reaction-based dysbiosis index (DI) between dogs with chronic diarrhea and healthy dogs; to assess interlaboratory variability in bacterial and fungal cultures among 3 veterinary diagnostic laboratories (diagnostic laboratory 1 [L1], diagnostic laboratory 2 [L2], diagnostic laboratory 3 [L3]); and to compare the reported interpretation of culture profiles (normobiosis versus dysbiosis) with those of the DI. ANIMALS: Eighteen dogs with chronic diarrhea (CDG) and 18 healthy control dogs (HG). METHODS: In this prospective, case-control study, fecal samples were submitted to 3 commercial laboratories for fecal culture. The microbiota was assessed using PCR assays. Dogs receiving antimicrobials were excluded. RESULTS: Dysbiosis index was significantly increased in CDG (mean, 0.9; SD, 3.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], -1.0; 2.8) compared to HG (mean, -3.0; SD, 2.8; CI, -4.3; -1.6; P = .0002), whereas cultures from all laboratories failed to detect significant differences (P = .66, .18, and .66, respectively). Hemolytic Escherichia coli was the only potential enteropathogen on culture, but no significant difference was found between CDG and HG. For diagnosis of dysbiosis, culture showed no agreement with DI (L1, κ = -0.21; CI, -0.44; -0.02; L2, κ = -0.33; CI, -0.58; -0.08; L3, κ = -0.25; CI, -0.39; -0.11). Furthermore, variability among the 3 laboratories was high (L1/L2, κ = 0.15; CI, -0.05; 0.35; L1/L3, κ = -0.08; CI, -0.01; -0.16; L2/L3, κ = -0.06; CI, -0.33; -0.20). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Fecal cultures failed to distinguish between diseased and healthy dogs, and a high level of interlaboratory variation for culture was found.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33277779/