PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

How minimally processed versus kibble diets affect dogs' metabolism

By Campbell, Louise et al.·Published in Frontiers in veterinary science·2026·University of Sydney, Australia·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Diet-induced metabolic and faecal microbiome responses in pet dogs fed a minimally processed versus extruded kibble diet.

Species:
dog
Stomach & digestionDogs

Plain-English summary

A group of 24 healthy dogs was studied to see how two different types of dog food affected their digestion and gut health. The dogs were fed either a minimally processed diet or an extruded kibble diet for two weeks each. The results showed that the minimally processed diet led to better stool consistency and a healthier gut microbiome compared to the kibble diet. This suggests that the type of food can significantly impact dogs' digestive health and overall well-being, indicating that owners might want to consider the food they choose for their pets.

People also search for: dog food gut health · minimally processed dog diet · kibble vs fresh dog food · dog stool consistency improvement

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The extent to which food is processed influences gut functions, such as digestion, nutrient uptake, and microbiome response, with the potential to impact immuno-metabolic health. Despite known associations between ultra-processed food (UPF) intake and chronic diseases in humans, mechanistic links explaining inferred health risks remain unclear. Health risks associated with chronic disease are also a concern for companion animals such as dogs, where nutritionally complete dry processed foods constitute a major component of contemporary pet dog diets. A challenge is that nutrition is complex and even diets based on nutritionally complete processed foods typically vary in multiple dimensions. METHODS: Here, we use a randomised, cross-over design to compare short-term effects of two commercially available nutritionally complete canine diets-an extruded kibble diet (EKD) and a mildly cooked, minimally processed diet (MPD). We assigned 24 healthy dogs to one of two groups: all dogs remained on their at-home diet for 1 week, before transitioning to (1) MPD or (2) EKD for 2 weeks each. One dog was removed from the study due to health complications, and the remaining 23 dogs completed both dietary treatment periods. Glycaemic, hormonal, and gut microbiome responses were captured from pre- and post-prandial blood samples and time series of 12 faecal samples from each dog. RESULTS: The experimental diets resulted in distinct physiological and gut microbiome responses. MPD was associated with improved faecal consistency (FCS 2.24 &#xb1; 0.67,= 0.005), lower pre- and post-prandial gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP, p < 0.001) and peptide YY (PYY,< 0.05), and reduced post-prandial glycaemic response compared to EKD (AUC,= 0.009). Diet was the strongest predictor of microbial response despite between-dog differences, with higher alpha diversity associated with MPD and greater within-individual community turnover following transition to MPD in both treatment groups (Group 1,< 0.001; Group 2,< 0.05). CONCLUSION: These data show the feasibility of testing diet formulations in pet dogs and understanding the role of host-microbiome interactions in responses to food. The demonstration of distinct outcomes highlights the need for further studies on long-term feeding to better understand mechanisms and implications for health in community pets.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42038049/