Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
How diphenhydramine and dimenhydrinate work in healthy dogs
By Ehling, Sarah et al.·Published in Veterinary dermatology·2019·Department of Molecular Biomedical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Diphenhydramine pharmacokinetics after oral and intravenous administration of diphenhydramine and oral administration of dimenhydrinate to healthy dogs, and pharmacodynamic effect on histamine-induced wheal formation: a pilot study.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of healthy mixed-breed dogs was given either diphenhydramine or dimenhydrinate (a combination of diphenhydramine and another ingredient) to see how well these medications worked for allergies. The study found that dimenhydrinate was absorbed better in the body compared to diphenhydramine alone, leading to higher levels of the medication in the dogs' systems. However, the effectiveness in reducing allergic reactions, measured by skin reactions to histamine, varied widely among the dogs. This suggests that while dimenhydrinate may be a better option for some dogs, individual responses can differ significantly.
People also search for: dog allergy treatment · diphenhydramine for dogs · dimenhydrinate dosage for dogs
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Histamine type-1 (H1) receptor antagonists such as diphenhydramine are frequently used for treatment of pruritus in dogs, yet therapeutic efficacy for allergic disorders is reported to be highly variable. Dimenhydrinate is a salt of diphenhydramine and 8-chlorotheophylline, and has been reported to produce superior oral absorption of diphenhydramine. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVE: To determine the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of diphenhydramine in dogs after intravenous (1 mg/kg) and oral (5 mg/kg) administration, and when given orally as dimenhydrinate at a dose of 10 mg/kg (≈5 mg/kg diphenhydramine). ANIMALS: Each drug was administered to six healthy, fasted mixed-breed dogs in a research facility, using a cross-over design. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analysis of diphenhydramine and chlorotheophylline at defined intervals. Pharmacodynamic response was measured by histamine-mediated cutaneous wheal formation. RESULTS: There was great variability in the data and one dog was an extreme outlier. The mean systemic availabilities of diphenhydramine were 7.8% and 22.0% after oral administration of diphenhydramine and dimenhydrinate, respectively, whereas the mean maximum concentrations were 36 (± 20) and 124 (± 46) ng/mL. The terminal elimination half-lives of diphenhydramine and dimenhydrinate were 5.0 (± 7.1) and 11.6 (± 17.7) h, respectively. Plasma diphenhydramine concentrations did not correlate with the percentage reduction in histamine-induced wheal formation. Theophylline reached plasma concentrations considered to be therapeutic for dogs. CONCLUSION: Oral absorption of diphenhydramine was approximately three times greater with a longer half-life when it was administered as the combination product dimenhydrinate.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30779257/