Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Daily changes in eye pressure and cornea thickness in Beagle dogs
By Garzón-Ariza, Alicia et al.·Published in Veterinary ophthalmology·2018·Department of Animal Medicine and Surgery, Spain·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Diurnal variations in intraocular pressure and central corneal thickness and the correlation between these factors in dogs.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of healthy Beagle dogs had their eye pressure (intraocular pressure) and corneal thickness measured throughout the day to see how they changed. The study found that both the eye pressure and corneal thickness decreased from morning to evening, with significant differences noted at various times. Interestingly, the thicker the cornea, the higher the eye pressure was, suggesting a connection between the two. These findings can help veterinarians better understand eye health in dogs and interpret eye pressure readings more accurately.
People also search for: dog eye pressure normal range · Beagle corneal thickness measurements · why is my dog's eye pressure low
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To study the diurnal variation in intraocular pressure (IOP) and central corneal thickness (CCT) in healthy Beagles by rebound tonometry and ultrasonic pachymetry, respectively, in addition to determining whether a correlation exists between these two variables. ANIMALS STUDIED: Twenty eyes from 10 healthy Beagle dogs were included in the study. PROCEDURES: The IOP and CCT were measured by rebound tonometry and ultrasonic pachymetry, respectively, at 2-h intervals over an 8-hour period between 10:00 and 18:00. RESULTS: The mean values (± SD) of IOP obtained were 11.45 ± 2.96 at 10:00, 10.00 ± 1.89 at 12:00, 8.25 ± 1.62 at 14:00, 7.05 ± 1.05 at 16:00, and 6.55 ± 1.36 at 18:00. The mean values (± SD) of CCT obtained were 554.95 ± 72.41 at 10:00, 549.20 ± 69.10 at 12:00, 566.15 ± 80.56 at 14:00, 545.45 ± 70.19 at 16:00, and 538.30 ± 73.33 at 18:00. The IOP and CCT of dogs were found to decrease progressively from the first to the last measurement. There were statistically significant differences between the IOP (P = 0.000) and CCT values (P = 0.032) measured at different times of the day. There was no effect or interaction between gender and eye with the dependent variables. The IOP and CCT were found to be positively correlated (r = 0.213, P = 0.034). The regression equation demonstrated that for every 100 μm increase in CCT, there was an elevation in IOP by 0.8 mmHg. CONCLUSIONS: The CCT and IOP values were lower in the afternoon/evening than in the morning, and these were positively correlated. Both findings are important for the diagnostic interpretation of IOP values in dogs.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29232036/