Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Dogs with persistent shunts after liver surgery have more urinary
By Burger, Nienke C et al.·Published in Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association·2023·1Small Animal Department·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Dogs with congenital extrahepatic portosystemic shunts that have persistent shunting after surgery have a higher prevalence of urolithiasis.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 25 dogs that had surgery for congenital extrahepatic portosystemic shunts (cEHPSS) were monitored for urinary stones (urolithiasis) over time. Out of these, only 1 dog with a closed shunt developed stones, while 4 out of 6 dogs that developed new shunts after surgery had urolithiasis. Interestingly, some dogs with the original condition saw their kidney stones shrink or disappear after surgery. This suggests that dogs who develop new shunts after surgery are at a higher risk for urinary stones, but those with closed shunts may have better outcomes.
People also search for: dog urinary stones after surgery · cEHPSS surgery complications · dog kidney stones treatment
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To report the presence of urolithiasis in dogs long-term after gradual attenuation of congenital extrahepatic portosystemic shunts (cEHPSS). ANIMALS: 25 client-owned dogs that underwent gradual attenuation of a cEHPSS, of which 19 had a closed cEHPSS and 6 developed multiple acquired portosystemic shunts (MAPSS) following surgery. PROCEDURES: A retrospective study with prospective follow-up was performed. Dogs that underwent cEHPSS surgery and had their postoperative cEHPSS status determined by transsplenic portal scintigraphy or CT angiography 3 months postoperatively were prospectively contacted and invited for a long-term follow-up visit (a minimum of 6 months postoperatively). Retrospective data were collected, and during the prospective follow-up visit a thorough history, blood tests and urinalysis, and ultrasonography of the urinary tract were performed to assess the presence of urinary signs and urolithiasis. RESULTS: Of 25 included dogs, 1 of 19 (5%) dogs with closed cEHPSS and 4 of 6 (67%) dogs with MAPSS had urolithiasis at long-term follow-up. Three (50%) dogs with MAPSS developed new uroliths. Long-term, dogs with closed cEHPSS that initially presented with and without urolithiasis had significantly less urolithiasis compared to dogs with MAPSS (P = .013 and P = .010, respectively). In the 4 dogs with closed cEHPSS that initially presented with nephrolithiasis, nephroliths became smaller or were no longer visible at the long-term follow-up visit. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Dogs that developed MAPSS following cEHPSS surgery are at greater risk of urolithiasis compared to those with closed cEHPSS. Furthermore, ammonium urate uroliths might dissolve if portosystemic shunting ceases to exist.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37217177/