Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
E-cadherin and beta-catenin affect invasion but not survival in dog
By Brunetti, B et al.·Published in Veterinary pathology·2005·Department of Veterinary Public Health and Animal Pathology, Italy·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: E-cadherin and beta-catenin reduction influence invasion but not proliferation and survival in canine malignant mammary tumors.
- Species:
- cat
Plain-English summary
A study looked at 60 dogs with malignant mammary tumors to see how two proteins, E-cadherin and beta-catenin, affected tumor growth and survival. It found that lower levels of these proteins were linked to more aggressive tumors that invade surrounding tissues, but they did not impact how quickly the tumors grew or how long the dogs survived. This means that while the presence of these proteins can indicate how invasive a tumor might be, they don't necessarily predict the dog's overall outcome. Treatment options would depend on the specific case and should be discussed with a veterinarian.
People also search for: dog mammary tumor treatment · canine cancer survival rates · E-cadherin beta-catenin in dogs
Abstract
E-Cadherin and beta-catenin are known for their role in tumor invasion, but both proteins also exert an influence on tumor proliferation. This study, performed on canine mammary tumors, aimed to analyze the influence of E-cadherin (E-cad) and beta-catenin (beta-cat), immunohistochemically assessed singly and in combination (E-cad/beta-cat), on survival and their relationship with several proliferation indices (AgNOR index, MIB1 index, mitotic index). Immunohistochemistry was carried out on 60 formalin-fixed, paraffin wax-embedded specimens of canine mammary malignancies. The labeling was defined as preserved when prevalent on cell membranes of more than 75% of cells and reduced in other forms of expression (i.e., membranous less than 75%, cytoplasmic, and negative). E-cad, beta-cat, and E-cad/beta-cat were preserved respectively in 22, 12, and 11 out of 60 cases. Immunohistochemical expression of the two proteins in the same tumors was significantly correlated (P = 0.0001; R = 0.57). Survival analysis revealed no difference in outcome comparing the preserved versus reduced cases (E-cad, P = 0.31; beta-cat, P = 0.29; E-cad/beta-cat P = 0.36). Grouping cases for histologic invasiveness, the expression of E-cad or beta-cat and E-cad/beta-cat showed a progressive reduction that paralleled an increase in invasiveness from noninfiltrating to stage-II tumors (E-cad, P < 0.001; beta-cat, P < 0.05; E-cad/beta-cat, P < 0.05). No significant difference was obtained comparing mitotic index, MIB 1 index, and AgNOR index by analysis of variance between the cases grouped for preserved or reduced E-cad, beta-cat, and E-cad/beta-cat variables. In conclusion, reduced expression of E-cad, beta-cat, or E-cad/beta-cat was significantly associated with the progression from noninfiltrating to highly infiltrating tumors but not with proliferation or survival.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16301574/