Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Bovine amniotic membrane helps heal dog corneal erosions
By Kim, Joon Young et al.·Published in Veterinary ophthalmology·2009·Department of Veterinary Medicine, United Kingdom·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Effect of bovine freeze-dried amniotic membrane (Amnisite-BA) on uncomplicated canine corneal erosion.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of eight Shih Tzu dogs with corneal ulcers underwent treatment to see which method helped their eyes heal best. The dogs were divided into four groups: one received no treatment, another had a transplant of bovine freeze-dried amniotic membrane, while the others had a nictitating membrane flap or a contact lens. The dogs that received the amniotic membrane transplant showed significantly better healing, with nearly 90% of their corneas healing compared to only about 38% in the control group. This suggests that using amniotic membrane can be a more effective option for treating corneal ulcers in dogs.
People also search for: dog corneal ulcer treatment · Shih Tzu eye problems · amniotic membrane for dog eyes
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of bovine freeze-dried amniotic membrane (FD-AM) (Amnisite-BA) in the surgical treatment of corneal ulceration in dogs. ANIMALS STUDIED: Eight normal Shih-tzu dogs. PROCEDURES: The corneas of 16 eyes were scored with an 8.0-mm trephine under general anesthetic and 100% ethanol was applied to remove a standardized button of corneal epithelium. The eyes were treated as described below and the corneas were evaluated 48 h later. The dogs were divided into four treatment groups: (i) control, (ii) amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT), (iii) nictitating membrane flap and (iv) contact lens. The proportion of the corneal wound that healed was calculated and all eyes were enucleated. Histological sections of cornea were assessed with the proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) assay. RESULTS: The proportion of corneas healed in the different treatment groups was (i) 38.02%, (ii) 89.15%, (iii) 52.31%, and (iv) 60.56%. Epithelial healing was significantly increased in the AMT group (ii) (P = 0.001) while groups (iii) and (iv) were not significantly different from the control group (P = 0.537 and P = 0.198, respectively). The number of PCNA positive cells was (i) 275.00, (ii) 740.50, (iii) 285.75 and (iv) 420.59, these varying compared with the control group with statistical significance of (ii) P = 0.002, (iii) P = 0.999, and (iv) P = 0.467. The greatest healing rate and epithelial cell proliferation was achieved with AMT compared to the other treatment regimes. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show that FD-AM transplantation is an effective treatment for enhancing canine corneal wound healing and suggest that the approach will provide superior results compared to conventional treatments for the condition.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19152596/