PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

How feline herpesvirus vaccines affect symptoms and virus shedding

By Summers, Stacie C et al.·Published in Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery·2016·Center for Companion Animal Studies, Department of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA, United States·View original on Crossref

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Effect of modified live or inactivated feline herpesvirus-1 parenteral vaccines on clinical and laboratory findings following viral challenge

Species:
cat

Plain-English summary

A group of 5-month-old kittens were tested for their response to two types of vaccines against feline herpesvirus-1 (FHV-1), a virus that can cause respiratory illness in cats. After being vaccinated, the kittens were exposed to the virus and monitored for signs of illness. The results showed that both the inactivated and modified live vaccines helped reduce the severity of symptoms compared to unvaccinated kittens, but the inactivated vaccine was better at preventing respiratory issues. This suggests that either vaccine can be effective for protecting cats at risk of FHV-1 exposure.

People also search for: kitten herpesvirus vaccine · cat respiratory illness prevention · FHV-1 vaccine effectiveness

Abstract

Objectives The objective was to investigate the effect of one dose of an inactivated feline herpesvirus-1 (FHV-1), feline calicivirus (FCV) and panleukopenia virus (FPV) vaccine (FVRCP) or one dose of a modified live (ML) FVRCP vaccine on clinical signs and shedding of FHV-1 in specific pathogen-free kittens after challenge with FHV-1 7 days after vaccination. Methods Twenty-four FHV-1 seronegative 5-month-old kittens were randomized into three groups of eight kittens. Group 1 kittens were maintained as unvaccinated controls, group 2 kittens were administered one dose of the inactivated FVRCP vaccine subcutaneously (SC) and group 3 kittens were administered one dose of the ML FVRCP vaccine SC. All 24 cats were administered FHV-1 by nasal and oropharyngeal inoculation 7 days later and were observed daily for clinical signs of illness for 21 days. Results In the 21 days after FHV-1 challenge, both groups of vaccinated cats were less likely to be clinically ill (indicated by lower cumulative clinical scores) than control cats ( P <0.001). There was no statistical difference in total clinical score between the two vaccinated groups ( P = 0.97). Although the total clinical score was similar between both vaccines, signs of respiratory disease were significantly fewer in the kittens vaccinated with the inactivated FVRCP vaccine compared with the ML FVRCP vaccine ( P = 0.005) during the period after inoculation when the majority of clinical disease was observed. Conclusions and relevance Parenteral administration of either the inactivated FVRCP vaccine or the ML FVRCP vaccine can decrease clinical signs of illness due to FHV-1 on a day 7 challenge when compared with controls. Use of either vaccine product is indicated in cats at risk of acute exposure to FHV-1.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on Crossref: https://doi.org/10.1177/1098612x16659333