Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Topical treatment and cleaning to clear MRSP bacteria in dogs
By Frosini, Siân-Marie et al.·Published in The Veterinary record·2022·Department of Clinical Services and Sciences, United Kingdom·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Effect of topical antimicrobial therapy and household cleaning on meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius carriage in dogs.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of dogs recovering from a skin infection caused by a resistant bacteria called MRSP (meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius) were treated with a topical medication and given guidance on household cleaning. Out of the dogs that received both the treatment and cleaning advice, about 56% cleared the bacteria, while only 33% of those who just cleaned their homes saw the same success. Unfortunately, even after treatment, some dogs showed signs of the bacteria returning. This suggests that while treatment can help, ongoing hygiene and monitoring are important to prevent future infections.
People also search for: dog skin infection treatment · MRSP in dogs · resistant bacteria in pets · how to clean home for dog infection
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius (MRSP) is a multidrug-resistant canine pathogen with a low zoonotic potential. This study investigated MRSP carriage and clearance through topical antimicrobial therapy and household cleaning in dogs recovered from MRSP infection. METHODS: Dogs were swabbed for MRSP carriage; household contamination was assessed using contact plates. Carrier dogs were allocated randomly to receive topical fusidic acid and chlorhexidine/miconazole treatment combined with owners implementing a household hygiene protocol (H&T) or implementation of hygiene alone (H) over three weeks. Carriage-negative dogs were monitored monthly. The relatedness of isolates over time was investigated by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). RESULTS: At inclusion, MRSP carriage was confirmed in 31/46 (67.4%) index dogs and 16/24 (66.7%) contact dogs, and contamination was found in 18/40 (45%) environments. In dogs completing all cycles, interventions cleared carriage in 5/9 (55.6%) dogs in group H&T and 2/6 (33.3%) in group H. Environmental contamination was infrequent but associated with carrier dogs (p = 0.047). Monthly monitoring of initially negative dogs showed intermittent carriage in 9/14 dogs. PFGE-concordance was found among all 34 MRSP isolated from eight index dogs over time. CONCLUSION: MRSP carriage was common in dogs after recovery from infection. Topical antimicrobial therapy temporarily eliminated carriage but recurrence was frequent. Management efforts must include the prevention of recurrent infections and hygiene.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34582577/