Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Effect of topical application of 0.5% proparacaine on corneal culture results from 33 dogs, 12 cats, and 19 horses with spontaneously arising ulcerative keratitis.
- Journal:
- Veterinary ophthalmology
- Year:
- 2019
- Authors:
- Edwards, Sydney G et al.
- Affiliation:
- Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital · United States
Plain-English summary
This study looked at how a topical anesthetic called proparacaine affects the results of tests for bacteria and fungi in dogs, cats, and horses with ulcerative keratitis, which is a painful eye condition. Researchers collected samples from 33 dogs, 12 cats, and 19 horses before and after applying either proparacaine or a saline solution. They found that the number of animals with bacteria detected did not change significantly after using proparacaine compared to saline. Overall, proparacaine did not seem to make a difference in the test results for bacteria or fungi, but the researchers suggest that further studies are needed to understand its clinical importance.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of topically applied proparacaine on bacterial and fungal culture results and to compare cytologic and culture results in patients with ulcerative keratitis. PROCEDURE: Corneal samples were collected from 33 dogs, 19 horses, and 12 cats with spontaneously arising ulcerative keratitis. Samples for bacterial (dogs, cats, horses) and fungal (horses) cultures were collected prior to and following application of 0.5% proparacaine or saline. All patients then received a topical anesthetic, and samples were collected for cytology. Frequency of cultivatable bacteria before (Swab 1) and after (Swab 2) application of proparacaine or saline was compared using Fisher's exact test. Homogeneity of culture and cytology results was assessed using McNemar's test. RESULTS: No difference was detected in number of animals from which bacteria were isolated from Swab 1 or Swab 2 for proparacaine (21/37 and 17/37, respectively) or saline (10/27 and 12/27, respectively). Small numbers prevented analysis of fungal culture results in horses between Swab 1 and Swab 2 for proparacaine (2/12 and 1/12, respectively) or saline (both, 1/8). Bacteria were isolated from 10 of 20 horses and detected cytologically in 3 of these; fungi were isolated from 3 of 20 horses and detected cytologically in 2 of these. Bacteria were detected more frequently using culture (31/64) than cytology (19/64). CONCLUSION: Proparacaine did not significantly alter bacterial or fungal culture results in cats, dogs, or horses; however, clinical significance warrants investigation. Culture and cytology provided complementary data; both should be performed to maximize organism detection in patients with ulcerative keratitis.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30193404/