Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Alfaxalone priming lowers anesthesia dose and affects heart
By Lagos-Carvajal, Angie et al.·Published in American journal of veterinary research·2020·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Effects of a priming dose of alfaxalone on the total anesthetic induction dose for and cardiorespiratory function of sedated healthy cats.
- Species:
- cat
Plain-English summary
Eight healthy adult cats were sedated and given either a small dose of alfaxalone or a saline solution before being fully anesthetized. The results showed that the cats needed less total alfaxalone when they received the priming dose of alfaxalone compared to saline. Additionally, their blood pressure remained stable, and there were no breathing issues during the procedure. This suggests that using alfaxalone as a priming agent can be beneficial for safely anesthetizing cats while minimizing the amount of medication needed.
People also search for: cat anesthesia safety · alfaxalone for cats · how much anesthesia for a cat · cat sedation effects · healthy cat anesthesia protocol
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of a priming dose of alfaxalone on the total anesthetic induction dose for and cardiorespiratory function of sedated healthy cats. ANIMALS: 8 healthy adult cats. PROCEDURES: For this crossover study, cats were sedated with dexmedetomidine and methadone administered IM. Cats next received a priming induction dose of alfaxalone (0.25 mg/kg, IV) or saline (0.9% NaCl) solution (0.025 mL/kg, IV) over 60 seconds and then an induction dose of alfaxalone (0.5 mg/kg/min, IV) until orotracheal intubation was achieved. Cardiorespiratory variables were recorded at baseline (immediately prior to priming agent administration), immediately after priming agent administration, after orotracheal intubation, and every 2 minutes until extubation. The total induction dose of alfaxalone was compared between the 2 priming agents. RESULTS: Mean ± SD total anesthetic induction dose of alfaxalone was significantly lower when cats received a priming dose of alfaxalone (0.98 ± 0.28 mg/kg), compared with when cats received a priming dose of saline solution (1.41 ± 0.17 mg/kg). Mean arterial blood pressure was significantly higher when alfaxalone was used as the priming dose. No cats became apneic or had a hemoglobin oxygen saturation of < 90%. Expired volume per minute was not significantly different between the 2 priming agents. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Administration of a priming dose of alfaxalone to healthy sedated cats reduced the total dose of alfaxalone needed to achieve orotracheal intubation, maintained mean arterial blood pressure, and did not adversely impact the measured respiratory variables.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33107747/