PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

How dog position affects lower back CT scans in lumbosacral disease

By Jones, Jeryl C et al.·Published in American journal of veterinary research·2008·Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Effects of body position and clinical signs on L7-S1 intervertebral foraminal area and lumbosacral angle in dogs with lumbosacral disease as measured via computed tomography.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of 86 dogs with lumbosacral disease (a condition affecting the lower back) underwent CT scans to see how their body position affected their spinal structure and any related pain or limping. The scans showed that when the dogs' spines were extended, the area around the nerves in the lower back was smaller compared to when they were flexed. However, the changes in spinal area did not directly relate to the presence of pain or limping in the hind legs. This study suggests that using CT scans can help veterinarians understand how different positions might affect dogs with lower back issues.

People also search for: dog lumbosacral disease symptoms · dog hind limb lameness treatment · CT scan for dog back pain

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To measure effects of dog position on L7-S1 intervertebral foraminal area and lumbosacral (LS) angle by means of computed tomography (CT) and determine whether changes in values between positions are associated with clinical signs in dogs with LS disease. ANIMALS: 86 dogs examined via a positional CT protocol that included flexion and extension scans of L7-S1. PROCEDURES: Archived CT images and medical records were reviewed. Included dogs had good-quality flexion and extension CT scans of L7-S1 and no evidence of fractures, neoplasia, or previous LS surgery. One person who was unaware of CT findings recorded clinical status with regard to 3 signs of LS disease (right or left hind limb lameness and LS pain) at the time of CT evaluation. One person who was unaware of clinical findings measured L7-S1 foraminal areas and LS angles, with the aid of an image-analysis workstation and reformatted parasagittal planar CT images. RESULTS: Intraobserver variation for measurements of L7-S1 foraminal area ranged from 6.4% to 6.6%. Mean foraminal area and LS angle were significantly smaller when vertebral columns were extended versus flexed. Percentage positional change in L7-S1 foraminal area or LS angle was not significantly different among dogs with versus without each clinical sign. There was a significant correlation between percentage positional change in L7-S1 foraminal area and LS angle in dogs with versus without ipsilateral hind limb lameness and LS pain. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Positional CT is a feasible technique for quantifying dynamic changes in L7-S1 intervertebral foraminal morphology in dogs with LS disease.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18980426/