Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Botulinum toxin A reduces prostate muscle contraction in dogs
By Lin, Alex Tong Long et al.·Published in European urology·2007·Department of Surgery and Pathology·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Effects of botulinum toxin A on the contractile function of dog prostate.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of dogs received injections of botulinum toxin A (BoNT/A) to see how it affected their prostate function. The dogs that got the higher dose of 200 units showed a significant decrease in prostate pressure responses compared to those that received a lower dose or a saline injection. While the lower dose caused some mild changes, the higher dose led to more noticeable atrophy in the prostate gland. Overall, the treatment reduced the prostate's ability to contract but still allowed it to relax normally, suggesting that BoNT/A could help manage prostate-related issues in dogs.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To study effects of botulinum toxin A (BoNT/A) on prostate contractile function in dogs. METHODS: One hundred units (N=6) or 200 units (N=5) BoNT/A was injected into dog prostate. Sham control group (N=7) received normal saline injections. Before and 1 mo after injection, prostate urethral pressure response to electrostimulation and intravenous (IV) norepinephrine was measured. Contractile responses of prostate strips were tested in tissue bath. Structural changes were evaluated with conventional histology and smoothelin immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Injection of normal saline and 100 units BoNT/A did not significantly change prostate urethral pressure response to IV norepinephrine and electrostimulation. However, injection of 200 units BoNT/A significantly reduced prostate urethral pressure response to IV norepinephrine and electrostimulation. Contractile responses of prostate strips to potassium chloride, electrostimulation, and phenylephrine did not differ between sham control and 100U groups. In the 200U group, however, all responses were less than those of sham controls. Control and BoNT/A groups exhibited nitric oxide-related relaxation in prostate strips precontracted by phenylephrine. Injection of 100 units BoNT/A induced mild atrophy of prostate gland; injection of 200 units BoNT/A induced more pronounced atrophic changes in prostate gland and vacuoles formation in smooth muscle cells of stromal tissue. CONCLUSIONS: Injecting BoNT/A into dog prostate reduces contractile function while maintaining relaxation response of the prostate. These effects make BoNT/A a viable option in managing prostate-related symptoms. However, large, randomized clinical studies to determine long-term effects and safety of BoNT/A application in human prostates are required.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17386969/