Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
How dexmedetomidine and atipamezole affect heart tests in healthy cats
By Côté, Etienne et al.·Published in Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association·2022·Department of Companion Animals, Canada·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Effects of dexmedetomidine and its reversal with atipamezole on echocardiographic measurements and circulating cardiac biomarker concentrations in normal cats.
- Species:
- cat
Plain-English summary
A group of 14 healthy cats were given a sedative called dexmedetomidine (DXM) to see how it affected their heart function. During sedation, the cats showed changes in heart rate and heart structure, but these effects started to improve within a couple of hours after reversing the sedation with another drug called atipamezole (APM). While some heart measurements returned to normal, others did not, and certain cardiac biomarkers in the blood remained elevated even after the sedation wore off. This information can help vets understand whether changes in a cat's heart function are due to medication or an underlying heart problem.
People also search for: cat heart rate after sedation · dexmedetomidine effects on cats · reversing sedation in cats
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of dexmedetomidine (DXM) and its subsequent reversal with atipamezole (APM) on the echocardiogram and circulating concentrations of cardiac biomarkers in cats. ANIMALS: 14 healthy cats. PROCEDURES: Cats underwent echocardiography and measurements of circulating cTn-I and NT-proBNP concentrations before (PRE) and during (INTRA) DXM sedation (40 µg/kg IM) and 2 to 4 (2H POST) and 24 (24H POST) hours after reversal with APM. RESULTS: Administering DXM significantly decreased heart rate, right ventricular and left ventricular (LV) outflow tract velocities, and M-mode-derived LV free-wall thickness; increased LV end systolic diameter and volume; and caused valvar regurgitation. While sedative effects resolved within 25 minutes of APM reversal, the evolution of echocardiographic changes was mixed: LV ejection fraction and mitral valvar regurgitation score were different at 2H POST than at both INTRA and PRE (partial return toward baseline), LV end-diastolic volume was different PRE to INTRA and INTRA to 2H POST but not different PRE to 2H POST (full return toward baseline), and M-mode-derived LV free-wall thickness was significantly different from PRE to INTRA and PRE to 2H POST (no return toward baseline). Serum cTn-I and plasma NT-proBNP concentrations increased significantly with DXM, which remained significant 2H POST. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Administration of DXM and APM reversal produced changes in echocardiographic results and in circulating cTn-I and NT-proBNP concentrations. Understanding these changes could help veterinarians differentiate drug effects from cardiac disease.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35175929/