Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
High-flow oxygen helps dogs breathe better during bronchoscopy
By Ortlieb, Julia et al.·Published in Frontiers in veterinary science·2025·Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Germany·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Effects of high-flow oxygen therapy on oxygenation in dogs undergoing diagnostic bronchoscopy.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 20 dogs undergoing a bronchoscopy (a procedure to look inside the airways) were given either high-flow oxygen therapy (HFOT) or traditional oxygen supplementation to see which helped them breathe better. The dogs receiving HFOT showed improved oxygen levels during the procedure, with fewer experiencing low oxygen levels compared to those on traditional oxygen. No serious side effects were noted from HFOT, although some dogs in both groups had mild issues like swallowing air. Overall, HFOT proved to be a more effective option for keeping dogs' oxygen levels stable during bronchoscopy.
People also search for: dog bronchoscopy oxygen therapy · high-flow oxygen for dogs · dog breathing problems during bronchoscopy
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Hypoxemia is a common complication during bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). High-Flow Oxygen Therapy (HFOT) has been used to improve oxygenation and prevent periods of hypoxemia in people undergoing bronchoscopy. OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of HFOT on oxygenation in dogs undergoing diagnostic bronchoscopy compared to a traditional oxygen supplementation method (TOT). A secondary objective was to assess potential HFOT-related complications. METHODS: Prospective randomized clinical trial. Dogs presented for diagnostic bronchoscopy were randomly assigned to receive either HFOT or TOT using nasal cannulas during the bronchoscopic procedure. Oxygenation was monitored through PaOmeasurements taken at seven time points: baseline (t0), after preoxygenation (t1), post-induction (t2), pre- and post-BAL sampling (t3 and t4), at the end of the procedure (t5), and 1 h after bronchoscopy (t6). Pre- and post-procedure thoracic radiographs were assessed for air leak syndrome or aerophagia. RESULTS: 20 privately owned dogs presented for diagnostic bronchoscopy were included in the study (HFOT group:= 10, TOT group:= 10). Baseline characteristics and physiological parameters did not differ significantly between groups. Five dogs in each group showed hypoxemia (PaO< 80 mmHg) at baseline with 1/5 in each group having PaO< 60 mmHg. HFOT improved oxygenation throughout the procedure, with a significant increase in PaOobserved after preoxygenation (= 0.001) and at the end of the procedure (= 0.013). Additionally, only 1/10 dogs in the HFOT group experienced hypoxemia during bronchoscopy compared to 5/10 dogs in the TOT group, and patients in the HFOT achieved numerically higher PaOvalues across all time points during the procedure (t1-t5). No serious adverse events related to HFOT were observed, although aerophagia occurred in both groups without necessitating intervention. CONCLUSION: HFOT can improve oxygenation and prevent episodes of hypoxemia in dogs undergoing bronchoscopy compared to traditional oxygen supplementation methods.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40196814/