PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Bupivacaine injection reduces pain after dog spay surgery

By Fitzpatrick, Courtney L et al.·Published in Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association·2010·Department of Clinical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Effects of infiltration of the incision site with bupivacaine on postoperative pain and incisional healing in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of 92 female shelter dogs undergoing spay surgery (ovariohysterectomy) received different treatments at the incision site to see if it would help with pain and healing. Some dogs got no injection, while others received saline or bupivacaine, either before or after the surgery. The results showed that there was no significant difference in pain levels or healing complications among the groups. However, dogs that received bupivacaine after surgery had less redness at the incision site compared to other treatments, but those that received it before surgery had more complications. Overall, using bupivacaine didn't provide extra pain relief during recovery.

People also search for: dog spay surgery recovery · bupivacaine for dogs pain relief · complications after dog surgery

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of infiltration of the incision site with bupivacaine hydrochloride as part of a multimodal analgesia protocol (incisional block) on postoperative analgesia and incisional healing. DESIGN: Randomized controlled clinical trial. ANIMALS: 92 shelter-owned female dogs undergoing routine ovariohysterectomy. PROCEDURES: As part of a multimodal analgesic protocol for ovariohysterectomy, dogs received 1 of the following treatments at the incision site: no injection (26 dogs), preincisional infiltration with saline (0.9% NaCl) solution (12 dogs) or bupivacaine (21 dogs), or postincisional infiltration with bupivacaine (33 dogs). Postoperative pain was assessed with the Glasgow pain scale and response to mechanical stimulation with von Frey filaments. Incisions were monitored for signs of inflammation (edema, erythema, and discharge) and complications in wound healing. RESULTS: There was no difference in pain scores or response to mechanical stimulation over time among treatments. There were no significant differences in incisional edema or discharge among treatments. There was significantly more erythema in dogs that received preincisional infiltration with saline solution at 4 hours after surgery and less erythema in dogs that received postincisional infiltration with bupivacaine at 24 hours after surgery, compared with other treatments. The number of complications for dogs that had preincisional infiltration of bupivacaine was higher than for dogs that had other treatments; complications included excessive inflammation, splenic laceration, and herniation. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: No additional analgesic benefit was found in dogs that underwent local bupivacaine infiltration as part of a multimodal analgesic protocol for ovariohysterectomy.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20707749/